search for: unfin

...Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > > In fact I am not sure why you would even wait with the finalization and do it > in a separate pass rather than doing it immediately after forming the bundle. > Using the pass today does not even work as the MachineVerifier will reject the > intermediate unfinalized state (missing internal read markers). I'd suggest to get > rid of the pass and the idea of delegating finalization to an own pass, any objections? No objections. Also, the existing finalizeBundle function works on Hexagon mostly by luck. Hexagon's packet semantics is "mostl...

...structing them and is not using the separate pass. In fact I am not sure why you would even wait with the finalization and do it in a separate pass rather than doing it immediately after forming the bundle. Using the pass today does not even work as the MachineVerifier will reject the intermediate unfinalized state (missing internal read markers). I'd suggest to get rid of the pass and the idea of delegating finalization to an own pass, any objections? == Too many different iterators == Another source of confusion even for experience register allocation developers is that we have 3 kinds of...

...newer bundle operand iterator. > In fact I am not sure why you would even wait with the finalization and do it > in a separate pass rather than doing it immediately after forming the bundle. > Using the pass today does not even work as the MachineVerifier will reject the > intermediate unfinalized state (missing internal read markers). I'd suggest to get > rid of the pass and the idea of delegating finalization to an own pass, any objections? Adding a BUNDLE instruction and duplicating operands doesn’t make sense in the presence of virtual registers and live intervals. The que...

...rote: >> >> In fact I am not sure why you would even wait with the finalization and do it >> in a separate pass rather than doing it immediately after forming the bundle. >> Using the pass today does not even work as the MachineVerifier will reject the >> intermediate unfinalized state (missing internal read markers). I'd suggest to get >> rid of the pass and the idea of delegating finalization to an own pass, any objections? > > No objections. Also, the existing finalizeBundle function works on Hexagon mostly by luck. Hexagon's packet semantics i...

I''m looking at writing a Mongrel handler that mimics the behavior of the Apache mod_put [1]. It allows for the streaming upload of very large (GB) files; it also supports resumable upload. Before I get too involved, I''d like to ask if my reading of the mongrel source code is correct, i.e. what I want to do isn''t currently possible. Looking at the class

1) I installed the ruby-1.9.2-p0 and rubygems-1.3.7 in the (/usr/local/src directory ) 2) Then i installed rails from terminal by typing follwoing sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies 3) Then i made a rails applcation from terminal as rails new demo then cd demo ruby

...iterator. > >> In fact I am not sure why you would even wait with the finalization and do it >> in a separate pass rather than doing it immediately after forming the bundle. >> Using the pass today does not even work as the MachineVerifier will reject the >> intermediate unfinalized state (missing internal read markers). I'd suggest to get >> rid of the pass and the idea of delegating finalization to an own pass, any objections? > > Adding a BUNDLE instruction and duplicating operands doesn’t make sense in the presence of virtual registers and live inter...