search for: unfilt

...erstanding the design? I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: filter "spam_filter"; if spamheaders { fileinto "spam"; stop; } Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my inbox. Based on the filter RFC, I was expecting the implicit keep to retain the filtered version. Am I misinterpreting the spec? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org http://www.adamw.org

...es through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: > > filter "spam_filter"; > if spamheaders { > ??? fileinto "spam"; > ??? stop; > } > > Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the > implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an > explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my > inbox. > > Based on the filter RFC, I was expecting the implicit keep to retain > the filtered version. Am I misinterpreting the spec? I did a quick test, and I am not seeing any problem...

...>>> filter "spam_filter"; >>> if spamheaders { >>> ??? fileinto "spam"; >>> ??? stop; >>> } >>> >>> Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the >>> implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an >>> explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my >>> inbox. >>> >>> Based on the filter RFC, I was expecting the implicit keep to retain >>> the filtered version. Am I misinterpreting the spec? >> &gt...

...#39;s essentially this: >> >> filter "spam_filter"; >> if spamheaders { >> fileinto "spam"; >> stop; >> } >> >> Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the >> implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an >> explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my >> inbox. >> >> Based on the filter RFC, I was expecting the implicit keep to retain >> the filtered version. Am I misinterpreting the spec? > > I did a quick test, an...

Hi, Is there a way to specify keys of a hash in params to filter_parameter_logging. For example, my payment form sends creditcard[:number] and creditcard[:type] in params and I filter these keys using filter_parameter_logging :number, :type. I don''t want :number and :type in other forms to be filtered. Is there a way to solve this? thanks, Ritesh

...site.no flowstation.no shortName dec.lat.va dec.long.va drainSqKm areaUnits drainSqKmFlow areaUnits staAbbrev param.nm paramShortName constitAbbrev param.units 2169570 2169570 Gills Creek at Columbia, SC 33.98960016 -80.97425727 152.7543752904 2 152.7543752904 2 GillsColumSC Total nitrogen, water, unfiltered, milligrams per liter Nitrate as N TN mg/L <span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyo...

...e...? > The "volume" and "disk" or "volume" and "lun" syntax can be used somewhat interchangeably. As your point out the features for disk and lun are slightly different.  Usage of the 'lun' syntax allows addition of the attribute "sgio='unfiltered'" > > > A couple of additional questions here: > > * Since the target device is already defined in the pool, I don't see the reason for defining it here as well, like in your example with the iscsi pool? Let's forget about iscsi > * I'd like to use v...

...e...? > The "volume" and "disk" or "volume" and "lun" syntax can be used somewhat interchangeably. As your point out the features for disk and lun are slightly different. Usage of the 'lun' syntax allows addition of the attribute "sgio='unfiltered'" > > > A couple of additional questions here: > > * Since the target device is already defined in the pool, I don't see the reason for defining it here as well, like in your example with the iscsi pool? Let's forget about iscsi > * I'd like to use v...

...= 'black') mtext("June - August", font=2,side=3,cex=1,col="black") legend("topright",c('Level 1','Level 2','Level 3', 'Level 4','Level 5', 'Level 6','Level 7','Level 8','Level 9','RAC UNFILT','RAC FILT 1 sig'),lty=1,pch=c(16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16),col=c('skyblue4','green','orange', 'light green','dark green','yellow','dark blue','purple','dark red','black', 'red'),ncol=1) legend(&quot...

Hi, I've really tried a lot of things but can't work it out.... I've got a Apple Laserwriter 630 working through appletalk/netatalk. Using lp/lpr I'm able to print, no problem. However, when using samba through Windows ME, the printer will print my pages but also throws out an additional blank page and a page with: ERROR: undefined OFFENDING COMMAND: STACK: This is my

...filtered by sieve, but any messages that don't hit any filters gives the error (in the sieve log): msgid=<XXXX at XXX.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX/': Invalid mailbox name As far as I can tell, Pidgeonhole has hard-coded to the behavior of 'keep' (that is unfiltered emails) to be: fileinto "INBOX/" However, in my setup "INBOX/" is not a valid folder. "INBOX" is. Is there a way to get pidgeonhole sieve to treat 'keep' as fileinto "INBOX"? Or do I need to reconfigure my dovecot namespaces? I tried play...

Hi Konrad, Sometime ago i reported this one at boot up: [ 3009.778974] mcelog:16842 map pfn expected mapping type write-back for [mem 0x0009f000-0x000a0fff], got uncached-minus [ 3009.788570] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3009.798175] WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:774 untrack_pfn+0xa1/0xb0() [ 3009.807966] Hardware name: MS-7640 [ 3009.817677] Modules linked in: [ 3009.827524] Pid:

...e...? > The "volume" and "disk" or "volume" and "lun" syntax can be used somewhat interchangeably. As your point out the features for disk and lun are slightly different.  Usage of the 'lun' syntax allows addition of the attribute "sgio='unfiltered'" > > > A couple of additional questions here: > > * Since the target device is already defined in the pool, I don't see the reason for defining it here as well, like in your example with the iscsi pool? Let's forget about iscsi > * I'd like to use v...

...ins = sieve postmaster_address = <snip> } plugin { sieve = /data/dovecot/user/%u.sieve sieve_extensions = +editheader sieve_max_redirects = 50 } And even if I change $sieve to: sieve = file:/data/dovecot/user/%u.sieve the error messages disappear but based on the sudden unfiltered wave of mails in my INBOX that I usually store somewhere else, I guess the path still doesn't work. Any ideas? Thanks, Petar Bogdanovic -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc...

...----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a global sieve rule in place to filter mailing-lists. This has worked well so far. Recently however one subscriber on a list seems to create strange character set encodings in the 'From' and 'To' headers. This leads to unprocessed/unfiltered mails (no errors thrown). Is this a configuration or Pigeonhole issue (latest HG used)? Headers from failing mail: From: "=?UTF-8?B?VG9yaW50aGllbA==?=" <user at domain.tld> To: "=?UTF-8?B?ImJpbmQtdXNlcnNAbGlzdHMuaXNjLm9yZyI=?=" <bind-users at lists.isc.org> R...

...e...? > The "volume" and "disk" or "volume" and "lun" syntax can be used somewhat interchangeably. As your point out the features for disk and lun are slightly different.  Usage of the 'lun' syntax allows addition of the attribute "sgio='unfiltered'" > > > A couple of additional questions here: > > * Since the target device is already defined in the pool, I don't see the reason for defining it here as well, like in your example with the iscsi pool? Let's forget about iscsi > * I'd like to use v...

...en there is HIGHMEM or DMA32 flag set. This may happen when btrfs is mounted from a loop device, which masks out __GFP_IO flag. The check in try_release_extent_state 3399 if ((mask & GFP_NOFS) == GFP_NOFS) 3400 mask = GFP_NOFS; will not work and passes unfiltered flags further resulting in crash at mm/slab.c:2963 [<000000000024ae4c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x3b4/0x5c8 [<000000000024c810>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x204/0x294 [<00000000001fd3c2>] mempool_alloc+0x52/0x170 [<000003c000ced0b0>] alloc_extent_state+0x40/0xd4 [btrfs] [<000...

..., I think it is important to allow the frontend to filter. I am not sure I follow, can you please elaborate. Are you saying that for example in the listing use case we don’t want the filtered diagnostics? In other words it should be up to the remark handler to decide whether it wants filtered or unfiltered remarks? > The frontend, or other tool, might also want to collect information from different compilation jobs to provide the user with an overall ranking. Strictly speaking about PGO, the different compilation jobs get the same PGO with the aggregated profile, thus the hotness calculated...

...0, 2.3.0, and 2.0.0 on several different computers (Mac OS 10.4.8, Windows XP, Linux). Below the signature, you will find my test case R code. My point in this folly is to take a dataframe of 300,000 rows, create a filter based on two of the rows, and count the number of rows in the filtered and unfiltered dataframe. One column in the filter only has the numbers 0.05, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45, 0.55, 0.65, 0.75, 0.85, 0.95, so I thought that I could just iterate in a for loop and get the job done. Just the simple single column filter case is presented here. Obviously, there are only ten numbers, so...

...nd to filter. >> >> I am not sure I follow, can you please elaborate. Are you saying >> that for example in the listing use case we don’t want the filtered >> diagnostics? In other words it should be up to the remark handler >> to decide whether it wants filtered or unfiltered remarks? > > We might or might not want them. The user might want to select different ratios and filters. > >>> The frontend, or other tool, might also want to collect information >>> from different compilation jobs to provide the user with an >>> overall r...