search for: unfavour

Many built-in applications jump to current priority + 101 upon unfavourable output. Does this apply to macros and AGI's also? Precisely, when an AGI returns non-zero, will Asterisk automatically take the call to +101? And when a macro hits an invalid extension, will Asterisk automatically take the call to +101? (So far the "i" extension could not b...

...at debian.org> wrote: > > Years ago Duncan set up a nightly job to feed RSS based off changes to > NEWS, > borrowing some setup parts from CRANberries as for example the RSS > 'compiler'. > > That job is currently showing the new \I{...} curly protection in an > unfavourable light. Copying from the RSS reader I had pointed at this since > the start [1], for today I see (indented by four spaces) > > CHANGES IN R-devel INSTALLATION on WINDOWS > > The makefiles and installer scripts for Windows have been tailored to > \IRtools44, an updat...

...ly, (in X86) we just write out a raw ".quad <label>" reference after lowering the function, where <label> is defined in the "xray_fn_idx" section. Unfortunately this causes the linker (gold?) to emit a relocation in the .text section (TEXTREL in ELF) which interferes unfavourably with GNU IFUNC relocations. Questions ========= Is there an alternative to this approach available to us from the LLVM back-end? I see that there's ways to define associative COMDAT sections, but that's COFF-specific and only works with COMDAT. We instrument XRay functions that aren...

Years ago Duncan set up a nightly job to feed RSS based off changes to NEWS, borrowing some setup parts from CRANberries as for example the RSS 'compiler'. That job is currently showing the new \I{...} curly protection in an unfavourable light. Copying from the RSS reader I had pointed at this since the start [1], for today I see (indented by four spaces) CHANGES IN R-devel INSTALLATION on WINDOWS The makefiles and installer scripts for Windows have been tailored to \IRtools44, an update of the \IRtools43 tool...

Hi, i am doing a statistics course and am having trouble with an exercise where i need to determine whether my success rate at something is higher than 80%. I was successful in 29 out of 60 trials, so these were the commands i entered into R: >n=60 >p.hat=29/n >p.0=0.8 >se.0=sqrt(p.0*(1-p.0)/n) >z=(p.hat-p.0)/se.0 >print(z) Which returned: [1] -6.132224 >1-pnorm(z) Which

I was working on a permutation-like variant of the bootstrap for smaller samples, and wanted to be able to get summary stats of my estimator conveniently. mean() is OK as its a generic, so a mean.oddboot function gets used automatically. But var, sd and others are not originally written as generic; they have to be explicitly masked by a package or new declaration. It would have been nice if

>>>>> Shu Fai Cheung >>>>> on Thu, 6 Jul 2023 17:14:27 +0800 writes: > Hi All, > I would like to ask two questions about printCoefmat(). Good... this function, originally named print.coefmat(), is 25 years old (in R) now: -------------------------------------------------------------------- r1902 | maechler | 1998-08-14 19:19:05 +0200 (Fri,