Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "unecesarri".
Did you mean:
unecesarry
2012 May 17
2
Manually copy over ldlinux.sys
Hello,
I am working on a remote upgrade that will utilize a squashfs to boot
off the hard drive.
I have everything worked out and functioning, except I see installing
extlinux as an unecesarry step. The only thing I use the command for
is to install the ldlinux.sys file to the /boot/extlinux/ folder.
The rest of it is just a file copy.
What manual step can I take to avoid the installation of
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
>
> Unless you upload a network capture of you mounting and doing the ls -lR
> on the client it's hard to say what really goes on. I understand you
> might not want to make it public.. but if you do
>
This is the last thing I'll try after I've exhausted all the other options.
How are you mounting your share (which mount options)?
>
Something weird is going on with
2019 Feb 14
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:
> Which implies that the server & client auto-negotiated a protocol version
> greater than SMB2.1, right? However, to be sure, I manually specified vers=
> in fstab, but something strange happened. While `man mount.cifs` claims
> that the following are allowed -- 1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3.1.1 (or 3.11) --
> few of them
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
>
> When you provide an exact vers= then no auto-negotiation happens (unless
> you pass "vers=3" which essentially means 3.x: use 3.0 or above). You
> either get the connection or mount fails. None the less, you can dump
> the current SMB ressources managed by the kernel by looking at
> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData if your kernel is recent enough it should show
> the SMB