search for: undisclosed

I get this in my security postings. Jun [undisclosed time] [undiscl.] login: 2 LOGIN FAILURES ON ttyv2 Jun [undisclosed time] [undiscl.] login: 2 LOGIN FAILURES ON ttyv2, qmaild As it turns out, I'm not running qmail :) And if I did, it would definitely have a nologin shell. But that's beside the point- I have had a perception that ttyv w...

...ox_list (ctx=0xbfe92d78) at message-address.c:214 ret = 151951304 #10 0x080eb5c9 in parse_group (ctx=0xbfe92d78) at message-address.c:246 ret = 152025736 #11 0x080eb64c in parse_address (ctx=0xbfe92d78) at message-address.c:268 start = (const unsigned char *) 0x90fba88 "undisclosed-recipients:" ret = 151951000 #12 0x080eb68b in parse_address_list (ctx=0xbfe92d78, max_addresses=4294967294) at message-address.c:283 ret = 0 #13 0x080eb78f in message_address_parse_real (pool=0x90e9500, data=0x90fba88 "undisclosed-recipients:", size=23, max_addresses...

After a question on R, Prof Brian Ripley writes: > However, you did not give your affiliation and I do not like giving free > consultancy to undisclosed commercial organizations. Please in future use > a proper signature block so that helpers are aware of your provenance. I have one question and one comment. Question: Are there specific standards about this for R mailing lists? I could not find any. I don't think that there should be be...

I am running PC-Pine under Windows XP, connecting via SSL to a Dovecot IMAP server (0.99.10-2 under Debian woody). When I open a mail folder (mbox format) in Pine I get the following non-fatal error: [Junk in end of group: pn=undisclosed-recipients al= dn=] A similar error was reported to comp.mail.pine as happening with a Lotus Domino server. Mark Crispin explained it as a server-side bug: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=4192a0ec.0307090631.32e1a815%40posting.google.com&...

...orted feature Remove the require line makes a forward. But this doesn't forward the message I set, but makes a new empty message... : - From Rudy.Gevaert at UGent.be Thu Sep 22 14:31:46 2005 - Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:29:01 +0200 (CEST) - From: Rudy.Gevaert at UGent.be (Rudy Gevaert) - To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Is this a bug? Or have i missed something? Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert e-mail: Rudy.Gevaert at UGent.be Directie ICT, Afdeling Infrastructuur Groep Systemen...

...sun_aux.exhibitor_info?p_conf_id= 124&p_location_id=124-1&p_exhibitor_id=5051> In summary Savaje is a brand new Java mobile phone OS that is highly programmable and customizable it has been awarded device of the show http://www.savaje.com/show_device.html There are a number of undisclosed hardware manufacturers who have signed on to offer hardware and undisclosed carriers will announce their involvement at the show. Now what does this have to do with Asterisk; lots. Basically at the show Savaje will be offering the first JavaOS handsets and appropriate SDK's for develope...

Hi! Unfortunately the version loaded on the office server is 2.6.0 (for some undisclosed so called policy decision by my adamant IT dept. who are not willing to upgrade), I need to use YieldCurve package compatible with this version. On my standalone machine I have R 2.9 loaded and hence I have no problem in using the YieldCurve package. (a) Kindly guide how do I download the version...

...you've gotten it to work you can feel free to email me off list. If your willing to share config's that also is a definate plus. Thanks, --Tammy ****************************************************************************** Disclaimer: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. *****************...

...9;Program Files' folder. Once I do this, I can read fine, but I can no longer create/amend/delete. Anyone got any ideas how to fix this? -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000

Wall Server: lfknplnm03 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mail-Info From: Webmaster <samba@samba.org> To: undisclosed-recipients: ; samba@samba.org CC: Rec.: preston.newton@txucom.com Date: 12/19/2003 06:05:53 AM Subject: [Samba] So sweet ... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________...

Hi Aki, first thanks for the quick fix. Unfortunately, it only resolves the issue partially. For the ?To: undisclosed-recipients:;?, it works now. For ?To: ? it still crashes (i. e. what I did with my manual lmtp dialog). Michael > On 13. Dec 2019, at 11:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > We have released v2.3.9.1 fixing this issue. > > Thank you for yo...

...2 Skype: khfischbach jabber: averlon at jabber.org Blog: averlon.posterous.com Signatur: Diese e-mail ist unter Umst?nden signiert. Die Signatur entspricht dem Deutschen Signaturgesetz und entsprechenden europ?ischen Regelungen. Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text...

Hallo Aki, the affected code location seems to be concerned with parsing to ?To:? header. I checked all the mails causing the crash, the To: header is either empty (but present) or contains ?undisclosed-recipients:;?. I checked this manually and sure enough lmtp crashes: nc -C -U dovecot-lmtp 220 keira.mike2k.de Dovecot ready. LHLO keira.mike2k....

...ed out>) at main.c:169 > > Michael > > >> On 13. Dec 2019, at 12:10, Michael Stilkerich <ms at mike2k.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Aki, >> >> first thanks for the quick fix. >> >> Unfortunately, it only resolves the issue partially. For the ?To: undisclosed-recipients:;?, it works now. For ?To: ? it still crashes (i. e. what I did with my manual lmtp dialog). >> >> Michael >> >>> On 13. Dec 2019, at 11:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> We have r...

************* eManager Notification ************** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Destination mailbox(es): "samba@samba.org" ******************* End of message ******************* -------------- next part -------------- Received: from 208.8.92.167 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:55:27 -0400 Received: from

...n Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. ____________________...

...gc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:169 Michael > On 13. Dec 2019, at 12:10, Michael Stilkerich <ms at mike2k.de> wrote: > > Hi Aki, > > first thanks for the quick fix. > > Unfortunately, it only resolves the issue partially. For the ?To: undisclosed-recipients:;?, it works now. For ?To: ? it still crashes (i. e. what I did with my manual lmtp dialog). > > Michael > >> On 13. Dec 2019, at 11:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> We have released v2.3.9.1 fixing this...

...400 Received: from localhost (IDENT:gafton@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alien.devel.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24281; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:38:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:38:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com> X-Sender: gafton@alien.devel.redhat.com To: Undisclosed recipients: ; Subject: SECURITY: RHSA-1999:032 Buffer overflows in amd Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908301537320.23939-100000@alien.devel.redhat.com> Approved: ewt@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - ------------------...

> Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists at eckel-edv.de>: > > Hi Alessandro, > >> Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple. IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont understand this too. It must be a misinformation about the current

...se assignments they didn't know that this could or would allow Bacula to begin a dual-license release in which some features were added to a separate proprietary release. Bacula's developers claim that the fork included code that was not licensed to them.? Their lawsuit was settled with undisclosed terms.? Given what information is available publicly, I am inclined to believe that the fork was in the wrong, but users are often more concerned with protecting people that they like than they are in license compliance.