search for: undesigned

...It should also allow the reader to skip records for types that have already been loaded in the main module. 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.)

...he reader to skip records for types that have > already been loaded in the main module. > > 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but > for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode > reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/9babc08b/attachment.html>

...ords for types that have >> already been loaded in the main module. >> >> 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but >> for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode >> reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/4ca33961/attachment.html>

...e brought in when the DICompileUnit is mapped since they are all in the retained types list. > > 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but > for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode > reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > Ditto here - any metadata referenced by multiple composite types does not go into a block, right? Thanks, Teresa -- Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com | 408-460-2413 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL...

...cords for types that have >> already been loaded in the main module. >> >> 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but >> for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode >> reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/676081d9/attachment-0001.html>

...ght in when the DICompileUnit is mapped since they are all in the retained types list. > > > 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but > for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode > reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > > Ditto here - any metadata referenced by multiple composite types does not go into a block, right? > > Thanks, > Teresa > > > -- > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com | 408-460-2413

Dear R-users, dear Ron I use pls from the pls.pcr package for classification. Since I need to know which variables are most influential onto the classification performance, what criteria shall I look at: a) B, the array of regression coefficients for a certain model (means a certain number of latent variables) (and: squared or absolute values?) OR b) the weight matrix RR (or R in the De

...ileUnit is mapped since they are all in the retained types list. > > > > > > 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but > > for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode > > reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > > > > Ditto here - any metadata referenced by multiple composite types does > not go into a block, right? > > > > Thanks, > > Teresa > > > > > > -- > > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com |...

...ileUnit is mapped since they are all in the retained types list. > > > > > > 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but > > for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode > > reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) > > > > Ditto here - any metadata referenced by multiple composite types does not go into a block, right? > > > > Thanks, > > Teresa > > > > > > -- > > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com | 408...

...cords for types that have >> already been loaded in the main module. >> >> 5. Create a special `METADATA_COMPOSITE_TYPE_BLOCK`, similar to (3) but >> for composite types and their members. This avoids the raw bitcode >> reading overhead. (This is totally undesigned at this point.) >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160323/8951a345/attachment.html>