search for: underwhelming

After spending a couple hours scanning for an open source (non- commercial) billing package yesterday I am underwhelmed. Almost all of the packages listed on the WIKI appear to be defunct, for several years now. I will be happy to get a login and edit them out if that is the proper method to do so. My requirements are very minimal and at this point unless I have missed something will

Chris Pearce wrote: > Hi Guys & Gals, > > I need you guys to decide whether we want to include extra granulepos > fields to Skeleton 4. Given the underwhelming discussion regarding this, > I'm guessing the need and/or desire for these fields isn't really there. I haven't commented mostly because I don't know what Monty's plans for a "grand unified granpos scheme" are. All of this is mostly in his head right now, and he n...

Has anyone found an ITSP that will relay T.38 fax to an asterisk 1.6.x instance AND do it reliably? If so, I can think of a number of locations with copper loops that could be scrapped. I'm actually quite surprised at what an underwhelming number of ITSP's that say they support T.38 (zero so far among my normal go-to companies). For locations that just want to be able to send (because they use fax-to-email for receive), It should be trivial to relay via T-38 to any of our asterisk servers that DO have a PRI or copper loop, an...

> Thanks, I'm having a look at it. I've also had a look at the > various files making up libspeex trying to see how hard the port to > java would be ... Having only had a cursory look it looks ok except > for filters_sse.h & lpt_sse.h which have some assembly. > > Jean-Marc can you throw some light on what these do ... Also > anyone interested in chiping in some

...it of the sample data to that type of curve.. starts high and finishes low but doesn't go below zero and only decreases. Looking at the arccot(x) definition I can see it as: arccot x = pi/2 - atan(x) So I tried to apply variations of that to the loess first "formula" parameter with underwhelming results. Am I even remotely on the right track? Can loess get me there? If not - another function? Any and all comments would be greatly appreciated. David -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: loess_curve.png Type: image/png Size: 31940 bytes Desc...

On 10 May 2010 23:20, Chris Pearce <chris at pearce.org.nz> wrote: > The granulepos radix was something that Conrad and Ralph were talking about > at FOMS2010. I don't know how it's supposed to be used, or why we need it. > It was supposed to be needed for Dirac? Maybe Ralph or Conrad can remember? > If not, we should remove it. There's no point in adding a poorly

Rather than failing to compile on platforms which lack POLLRDHUP such as FreeBSD, simply fallback to the old method of sleeping. This leaves the porting suggestions as a comment in case someone wants to implement a better solution for particular platforms. --- server/public.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git

Might I make a suggestion? I manage a few rather large cross platform projects which include embedded targets, Windows OS w/ multiple Visual Studio targets (2003, 2005, and 2008), and some Linux flavors. In the past we hand built all the makefiles and manually maintained the Visual Studio project / solution files, which has always been a pain. Recently we've made a successful partial

...use open-source compiler. There are some good > > open-source compilers (ORC, IMPACT) but these break like twigs, and > > aren't really intended for production use. There's GCC which is > > _reasonably_ solid these days but the performance ranges from poor to > > underwhelming. I'm hoping that llvm-gcc will become an alternative for > > those who can't/won't use the Intel or HP compilers. > > > > Duraid > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc....

...iscussed this with Daniel Berlin, but I'm having > trouble find a record of the conversation. IIRC, he says that he once > threw a huge amount of computing power at doing a /full/ > context-sensitive AA on some software, and the speedup he observed in > the resulting program as underwhelming (10-15%?). I kind of expect that. As you mentioned later, most optimization passes work in a context-insensitive manner (i.e. they won't clone a function and optimize differently on different clones). Context sensitivity on the pointer analysis side is probably not going to help a lot if the...

To be honest, I don’t either know what really happens under the hood when CMake creates the xCode project for CLang+LLVM. But there’s something really explicit going on there, because the project as it’s shown in xCode does not have the same file grouping structure than the actual physical folders. Not only the project file grouping doesn't match the physical folder locations, but the group

...ne makes for 8 machines.. Not a big deal. Array implementation and rails calls * Supposedly each rails call creates 60000(!) arrays. * There is a patch to make Array implementation quicker – but it is not accepted yet. Problem with Ruby is some guys hobby * At rubyconf matz’s talk was underwhelming. Development way slow. * rubinius (sp?) – Interpreter would be compiled to C. And interpreter would be written in ruby. Apparently good performance gains have been seen. Corporate support, etc. * IBM hosting this * Sun doing jruby * See recent post on digg – php eats rails for lun...

...out some things that highlight my use of LLVM. - Multiple execution models: building libraries, executables, or even running the JIT. I'm trying to stay very flexible here and LLVM is making it easy. - Optimization: So far I've done nothing, LLVM is doing a great job cleaning up my rather underwhelming IR. This lets me focus entirely on my language at the moment. - Arbitrary bit-size integers: I really like having these in the IR. I dislike fretting at the high-level about exactly what size an integer is, thus I've directly exposed LLVM's ability to have arbitrary bit sizes. (I just need...

...changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) This means 'make check' will fail on FreeBSD; do we have a way to introspect whether a platform lacks POLLRDHUP this is the case, to skip rather than fail tests/test-shutdown.sh on those platforms? At any rate, the fallback is reasonable, even if underwhelming in performance, so ACK. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org

I found that one of my users' workstation is, for some reason, running systemd-sleep. I cannot find, anywhere on the system. system-sleep.conf (or systemd-sleep.conf), nor do I find systemctl status system[d]-sleep. How can I turn this thing off, other than renaming /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-sleep? mark

...=yes can handle some NAT routers, it does not handle all situation in both directions. Our experience suggests that nothing short of a full SIP Outbound Proxy is going to handle things properly. We have tried out ABP International's NATpass and SNOM's NATfilter, both with results that were underwhelming. Has anyone out there tried out a software SIP Outbound Proxy that works? George Pajari netVOICE communications

[this message is a resend, I apologise for duplicates, but I think the original mail did not make it.] 12/3/2004 hi, I followed the instructions faithfully in http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 and the directions were very understandable and almost painless. I did miss the documentation, as "make progdocs" would not work since the package "doxygen" was not

I've tested a few different wifi SIP phones for office/factory use, and generally have been underwhelmed. Before I grab another few and test, I'd like to ask around here about the candidates. My requirements are relatively simple: - WEP/PSK should be supported WITHOUT dragging the phone down - roaming between access points without dropping the call - decent set of ringers, not the

Greetings, We have been attempting to set up a centos ldap server and then tried to log in with a user account specified in our ldap environment on a centos workstation. As soon as we attempt any kind of login from the centos workstation, be it via gdm or su ldap_user, the slapd process on the ldap server goes to 100% cpu. Is this normal behaviour?

hi, I followed the instructions faithfully in http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 and the directions were very understandable and almost painless. I did miss the documentation, as "make progdocs" would not work since the package "doxygen" was not included in that WIKI guide, and probably that means I will have to spend some more time in "digging"