Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "underting".
Did you mean:
underling
2004 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...es constants into register when needed
At least first two things will be necessary for my backend too. I start to
wonder if it makes sense to make a "BasicInstructionSelector" which will have
such reusable logic?
Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting
of LLVM codebase.
- Volodya
2004 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...For now, I recommend just copying the code to get something up and running
quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent
helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better.
> Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting
> of LLVM codebase.
Not at all! Please ask! BTW, what architecture are you targetting?
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
2004 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...get something up and running
> quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent
> helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better.
Ok, I'll try to.
> > Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting
> > underting of LLVM codebase.
>
> Not at all! Please ask!
Thanks.
> BTW, what architecture are you targetting?
That's NM6403 -- an DSP produced by one russian company (http://module.ru).
As I've already said, my interest is in my PhD research -- I plan to run some
analysis on LLVM repr...
2016 Apr 04
0
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a
> compaction patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are
> in mm/migrate.c
Indeed. The title is rather misleading but not sure it's a good idea
to separate compaction and migration part.
I will just resend to change the tile from
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction
patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c
On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was
> enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g.,
> webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction
patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c
On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was
> enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g.,
> webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,