Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "undertest".
Did you mean:
undertested
2015 Feb 13
6
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
...ared ASan runtime
on Linux.
4 [!!!]) Autotools build doesn't have *any* support for building and
running tests.
5) The sets of compiler flags we use to build runtimes are different in two
builds, and are hard to kept in sync.
Because of (4), sanitizer runtimes built with autotools are severely
undertested, and maintaining two different build systems is a burden I
would like to get rid of. Now seems to be a good time for that: we've cut
off 3.6 release branch, and Hans assures me that 3.7 release process will
use CMake.
Are there existing users of configure/make that want sanitizers to be
avai...
2015 Feb 17
6
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
...Linux.
> 4 [!!!]) Autotools build doesn't have *any* support for building and running tests.
> 5) The sets of compiler flags we use to build runtimes are different in two builds, and are hard to kept in sync.
>
> Because of (4), sanitizer runtimes built with autotools are severely undertested, and maintaining two different build systems is a burden I would like to get rid of. Now seems to be a good time for that: we've cut off 3.6 release branch, and Hans assures me that 3.7 release process will use CMake.
>
> Are there existing users of configure/make that want sanitizers...
2015 Feb 18
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
...4 [!!!]) Autotools build doesn't have *any* support for building and running tests.
>> 5) The sets of compiler flags we use to build runtimes are different in two builds, and are hard to kept in sync.
>>
>> Because of (4), sanitizer runtimes built with autotools are severely undertested, and maintaining two different build systems is a burden I would like to get rid of. Now seems to be a good time for that: we've cut off 3.6 release branch, and Hans assures me that 3.7 release process will use CMake.
>>
>> Are there existing users of configure/make that want san...
2007 Sep 26
1
Theora decoding problem on PowerPC
Hi,
I'm attempting to decode Theora videos on a PowerPC running a Linux
2.6.19 kernel. The version of GCC I'm cross-compiling from is 3.4.4.
The software versions I'm running are:
libogg-1.1.3
libpng-1.2.20
libtheora-1.0beta1
libvorbis-1.2.0
These are all the latest I was able to download.
Here's a back trace I got while running "dump_video" under