search for: undert

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "undert".

Did you mean: under
2004 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...es constants into register when needed At least first two things will be necessary for my backend too. I start to wonder if it makes sense to make a "BasicInstructionSelector" which will have such reusable logic? Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting of LLVM codebase. - Volodya
2004 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...For now, I recommend just copying the code to get something up and running quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better. > Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting > of LLVM codebase. Not at all! Please ask! BTW, what architecture are you targetting? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
2004 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...get something up and running > quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent > helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better. Ok, I'll try to. > > Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting > > underting of LLVM codebase. > > Not at all! Please ask! Thanks. > BTW, what architecture are you targetting? That's NM6403 -- an DSP produced by one russian company (http://module.ru). As I've already said, my interest is in my PhD research -- I plan to run some analysis on LLVM r...
2016 Apr 04
0
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
...of subsystem should > >clear PG_isolated via ClearPageIsolated. > > > >5. If a subsystem want to release isolated page, it should > >clear PG_isolated but not PG_movable. Instead, VM will do it. > > Under lock? Or just with ClearPageIsolated? Both: ClearPageIsolated undert PG_lock. Yes, it's better to change ClearPageIsolated to __ClearPageIsolated. > > >Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka at suse.cz> > >Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman at suse.de> > >Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com> > >Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org &...
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was > enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g., > webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was > enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g., > webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,