Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "undert".
Did you mean:
under
2004 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...es constants into register when needed
At least first two things will be necessary for my backend too. I start to
wonder if it makes sense to make a "BasicInstructionSelector" which will have
such reusable logic?
Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting
of LLVM codebase.
- Volodya
2004 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...For now, I recommend just copying the code to get something up and running
quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent
helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better.
> Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting underting
> of LLVM codebase.
Not at all! Please ask! BTW, what architecture are you targetting?
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
2004 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] Some backend questions
...get something up and running
> quickly. In the future we can talk about creating a target independent
> helper class once we understand the requirements and constraints better.
Ok, I'll try to.
> > Sorry if the above is not very clear -- I'm only starting to getting
> > underting of LLVM codebase.
>
> Not at all! Please ask!
Thanks.
> BTW, what architecture are you targetting?
That's NM6403 -- an DSP produced by one russian company (http://module.ru).
As I've already said, my interest is in my PhD research -- I plan to run some
analysis on LLVM r...
2016 Apr 04
0
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
...of subsystem should
> >clear PG_isolated via ClearPageIsolated.
> >
> >5. If a subsystem want to release isolated page, it should
> >clear PG_isolated but not PG_movable. Instead, VM will do it.
>
> Under lock? Or just with ClearPageIsolated?
Both:
ClearPageIsolated undert PG_lock.
Yes, it's better to change ClearPageIsolated to __ClearPageIsolated.
>
> >Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka at suse.cz>
> >Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman at suse.de>
> >Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com>
> >Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
&...
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction
patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c
On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was
> enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g.,
> webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 02/16] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
Might have been better as a separate migration patch and then a compaction
patch. It's prefixed mm/compaction, but most changed are in mm/migrate.c
On 03/30/2016 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was
> enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g.,
> webOS, android) uses lots of non-movable pages(e.g.,