Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "underperformance".
2009 Aug 22
1
Disc reading problem...
...reen or other indication. I then tried to rename the exe and other files on the disc and reburn it. It seems to have installed fine but upon loading the menu it shows a NO DISC error and the menu itself runs extremely slow. I have checked the appDB and apparently no such bug or for that matter such underperformance has been indicated with this particular game. If anyone could shed some light on this, it would be much appreciated. Thanks! I am running Mint 7 Gloria under GNOME.
2017 Nov 01
2
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wednesday, November 01, 2017 4:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
> > Ilya: - you might have more completions than descriptors available
> > - partial descriptor chains are a problem for hardware because you
> > might have to read a bunch of conscriptors twice - how would you do
> > deal with a big
2017 Nov 01
2
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wednesday, November 01, 2017 4:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
> > Ilya: - you might have more completions than descriptors available
> > - partial descriptor chains are a problem for hardware because you
> > might have to read a bunch of conscriptors twice - how would you do
> > deal with a big
2017 Nov 01
0
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 03:52:12PM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 01, 2017 4:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
> > > Ilya: - you might have more completions than descriptors available
> > > - partial descriptor chains are a problem for hardware because you
> > > might
2005 Aug 03
0
Will Shares of This Company be Moving Higher?
Investment Times Alert Issues: (STRONG BUY)
We Told last week at 1.20 to WATCH and now its $2.35 and
we think it goes to $4.00 on expected news this week...
Harbin Pingchuan Pharmaceutical: (PGCN)
Current Price: $2.35
Shares Outstanding: 20 Million
Market Capitalization: $6 Million
Short Term Target: $5.75
12month Target: $10.00 (!!!)
***We told you there was going to be a BIG move on
2017 Nov 01
2
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > You have to either use and additional descriptor for metadata per chain.
> > Or putting it in one of the buffers and forcing the lifetime of the metadata
> and data to be the same.
>
> That's true. It would be easy to make descriptors e.g. 32 bytes each, so
> you can add extra data in there. Or if we
2017 Nov 01
2
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > You have to either use and additional descriptor for metadata per chain.
> > Or putting it in one of the buffers and forcing the lifetime of the metadata
> and data to be the same.
>
> That's true. It would be easy to make descriptors e.g. 32 bytes each, so
> you can add extra data in there. Or if we
2001 Aug 13
0
erappin' - daily morning update 8-13-01 (PR#1051)
erappin' - daily morning update
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
BLEAK ECONOMIC PICTURE
We got a mixed bag of reports by retailers at the end of last week. As
you know, retail sales are a key element to this economy's growth as
continued consumer spending is necessary to remain out of a recession.
Market analysts are hoping
2001 Aug 13
0
erappin' - daily morning update 8-13-01
erappin' - daily morning update
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
BLEAK ECONOMIC PICTURE
We got a mixed bag of reports by retailers at the end of last week. As
you know, retail sales are a key element to this economy's growth as
continued consumer spending is necessary to remain out of a recession.
Market analysts are hoping
2017 Nov 02
0
Virtio BoF minutes from KVM Forum 2017
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 06:12:09PM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > You have to either use and additional descriptor for metadata per chain.
> > > Or putting it in one of the buffers and forcing the lifetime of the metadata
> > and data to be the same.
> >
> > That's true. It would be
2017 Jul 19
1
[virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM
> To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com>
> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
> Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis
2017 Jul 19
1
[virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM
> To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com>
> Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
> Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis
2017 Jul 18
0
[virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org]
> > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM
> > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org
> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
>
2017 Jul 16
1
[virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org]
> On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM
> To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
> Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2
>
> This is an update from v1
2007 Sep 13
26
hardware sizing for a zfs-based system?
Hi all,
I''m putting together a OpenSolaris ZFS-based system and need help
picking hardware.
I''m thinking about using this 26-disk case: [FYI: 2-disk RAID1 for the
OS & 4*(4+2) RAIDZ2 for SAN]
http://rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2418
Regarding the mobo, cpus, and memory - I searched goggle and the ZFS
site and all I came up with so far is that, for a
2007 Sep 13
26
hardware sizing for a zfs-based system?
Hi all,
I''m putting together a OpenSolaris ZFS-based system and need help
picking hardware.
I''m thinking about using this 26-disk case: [FYI: 2-disk RAID1 for the
OS & 4*(4+2) RAIDZ2 for SAN]
http://rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2418
Regarding the mobo, cpus, and memory - I searched goggle and the ZFS
site and all I came up with so far is that, for a
2017 Feb 08
16
packed ring layout proposal v2
This is an update from v1 version.
Changes:
- update event suppression mechanism
- separate options for indirect and direct s/g
- lots of new features
---
Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation.
The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure,
replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor
buffer.
* Descriptor ring:
Guest adds descriptors with
2017 Feb 08
16
packed ring layout proposal v2
This is an update from v1 version.
Changes:
- update event suppression mechanism
- separate options for indirect and direct s/g
- lots of new features
---
Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation.
The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure,
replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor
buffer.
* Descriptor ring:
Guest adds descriptors with