search for: underly

Hi, I am writing a pass that works at machine level and runs as last pass in llc (just before converting llvm specific machine instructions into target specific instructions) In this pass I am trying to get underlying object for memory operations. It turns out that due to various optimizations on machine instructions, the memory operand in the operation is not always getelementptr (for e.g., it can be phi node/bitcast/inttoptr instruction) Can someone suggest best way to get the underlying object?? -- Regar...

...ld be in promiscuous mode only if a DLPI application enables it using dlpi_promiscon() with DL_PROMISC_PHYS flag. So, we do not register VNIC''s promiscuous call back function if the NIC is put in promiscuous mode. > But do VLANs appear as "in promiscuous mode" if the > underlying interface is set that way? After all, listeners on the > underlying interface can see the VLAN traffic. > Since snv_105, VLAN''s are implemented as VNIC''s so as per explanation before VLAN''s wouldn''t be in promiscuous mode if the underlying NIC is...

...= @"Domain Admins", @"Domain Computers" This means that only members of the 'Domain Admins' or 'Domain Computers' groups can connect to the share, whilst Louis has this showing in his ACLs from getfacl: Creator owner special. Only folders and files on underlying folders. Creator group special. Only folders and files on underlying folders. Verified users read+exec This folder underlying folders and files Domain Admins Full This folder underlying folders and files Domain users read+exec This folder underlying folders and...

You can use the GetUnderlyingObjects function (notice the S at the end of the name) to collect zero or more underlying objects. This method is similar to GetUnderlyingObject except that it can look through phi and select instructions and return multiple objects. On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:15 AM, rahul <rahul3527 at gmail.co...

...ions.. can anyone tell me whats going on here , what i can do to fix this.. do i need to smooth each expiration's line then interpolate.... ?? library(RQuantLib) library(quantmod) library(rgl) library(akima) library(ggplot2) library(plyr) GetIV <- function(type, value, underlying, strike,dividendYield, riskFreeRate, maturity, volatility, timeSteps=150, gridPoints=151) { AmericanOptionImpliedVolatility(type, value, underlying, strike,dividendYield, riskFreeRate, maturity, volatility,...

...other two try to illustrate associated issues, emerged from applying it. Is it OK to commit the first patch? [PATCH] Bugfix for missed dependency from store to load in buildSchedGraph(). Bugfix for missed dependency from store to load in buildSchedGraph(). Background: When handling underlying objects for a store, the vector of previous mem uses, mapped to the same Value, is afterwards cleared (regardless of ThisMayAlias). This means that during handling of the next store using the same Value, adjustChainDeps() must be called, otherwise a dependency might be missed....

Hi, For some dataset I have made a histogram, boxplot en qqplot. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4634093/Naamloos.jpg Investigate the data with the given functions for making QQ-plots and find an appropriate location-scale family for the underlying distribution of this sample. Apart from giving a proper location-scale family, also specify the member of the location-scale family that is most close to the underlying distribution of the data, in other words, give estimates for the location and scale of the underlying distribution of the data...

The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's underlying value aliases with the merged allocas: // Update the MachineMemOperand to use the new alloca. 522 for (MachineInstr::mmo_iterator MM = I->memoperands_begin(), .... // Climb up and find the original alloca. 532 V = GetUnderlyingObject(V); 533 // If we did not...

...occur (or it's an UB operation). > Therefore I don't think basicAA cares about the size of the whole object, but just the remaining part of it (size-offset). But again, I could be wrong here. No, it cares about the size of the whole object in the code quoted below. const Value *O1 = GetUnderlyingObject(V1, TD); But that is fine. See answers below. > > > Quoting Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> In the following instruction sequence, llvm.objectsize.i64(p) returns 6 (the entire *.ll is attached to the mail). >> Is this...

Dear people, I have got a question concerning the underlying numerical codes when reading an SPSS file into R. I used the package foreign and when I look at a variable I get the verbal codes. I would like to know how it is possible to get the underlying numerical codes as output, which are the same as in my SPSS file. Thank you very much in advance for...

Dear R Developers: Is there a way to look at the underlying code from such items as R_setup_starma, please? Thanks, Erin Erin M. Hodgess, PhD Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: hodgesse@uhd.edu [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I''ve got a quick question: Does btrfs adapt to size changes of the underlying block device(s)? My specific situation is as follows: I''ve got a luks-volume on which I want to put btrfs. If this luks-volume grows in the future (i.e. by ''cryptsetup resize''), will btrfs automatically (and reliably) "see" this and be able to use the additi...

...t is impossible that these accesses alias. > …. This is not how LLVM disambiguates in the basicaa code fragment you quote below. The code fragment asserts that something can be assumed "no alias" if the access size of an memory access (i.e. a load or store) is bigger than the underlying object of the other accessed object. For you example below: V1Size = sizeof(mydata) V2Size = say 4 assuming that GetUnderlyingObject for addr1 and addr2 returns mydata: getObjectSize(O1) = sizeof(mydata) getObjectSize(O2) = sizeof(mydata) this should be isObjectSmallerThan(O2, V1Size) == f...

...now. Would you be interested in taking this one? If so, make sure to split it in multiple smaller patches, starting with one for the LangRef.doc and the Attributor. FIWI, I think we want the attribute to mean 1) below. I note this because 2) is "the opposite" of dereferenceable. 1) the underlying object is at most this large, where the pointer points to doesn't matter. 2) the underlying object has at most X more dereferenceable bytes from this point forward. I think we want 1) and later the opposite of 1) as well. Does this make sense? Cheers, Johannes --------------...

...y commenting quite short. This makes me feel like the code needs a bit of refactorization to make it more simple and understandable. Looking at the possibility of refactorization / redesign, I wonder what are the main strong points of this implementation right now, in your opinion? The mapping to underlying objects looks nice to me, but I am not sure I understand why to go through the trouble of clearing lists and using a set of RejectMemNodes with adjustChainDeps(). It is very complex code, and I wonder what is gained in the end here. Does anyone have any thoughts about it? Is it to handle huge r...

...was actually 8001. Check that. Matt -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org]On Behalf Of Samuel Hathaway Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:43 PM To: icecast@xiph.org Cc: darkeye@users.sourceforge.net Subject: [icecast] Re: DarkIce 0.6 and Lame 3.89: underlying sink error On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Samuel Hathaway wrote: > Hey, > > I've compiled DarkIce 0.6 dynamically linked to LAME 3.89. I'm running > Slackware 8 and using gcc 2.95.3. Running DarkIce yields the following > output: > > DarkIce 0.5 live audio streamer, http://...

...escription ( RW): Default install of XenServer [root@iDEAL0510XEN1 ~]# xe sr-create host-uuid=516c8c44-5f93-4177-9ee0-02f0a6efe976 content-type=user type=lvm device-config:device=/dev/sdc shared=false name-label="Local Storage 4 2TB" The SR operation cannot be performed because a device underlying the SR is in use by the host. Help! Bobbyd _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...ungary, http://tyrell.hu Using config file: darkice.cfg Using POSIX real-time scheduling, priority 98 LAME version 3.89 (beta 1, Oct 2 2001) (http://www.mp3dev.org/) Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 8002 Hz - 8535 Hz DarkIce: LameLibEncoder.cpp:194: lame lib opening underlying sink error [0] This also happens with DarkIce 0.5. Any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks in advance. -samuel --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at x...

Hello, everybody I use virt to run my VM's and QEMU as a hypervisor. There is a file describing my virtual machine: /etc/libvirt/qemu/centos7.0.xml As you know it contains xml representation of my VM. Is there any way to show underlying qemu command that virsh runs using that file? For example: qemu-system-x86-64 -m 1024 -smp 2 -... If no, is there any way to figure it out during VM run ? --- Thanks in advance, Roman Storozhenko

...at do you understand by a Manifold? I'm curious about > more documentation. > http://www.ihear.com/FreeCLAS/wiki/ALingA has most of the important bits. The skeleton track specifies the counts of the number of interleaved LingA and signal streams (which may or may not be interleaved), the underlying manifold, and the relationships of the signal manifolds to the underlying manifold. (LingA is the linguistic annotation format.) The notion of Manifold as used here: One dimension of this manifold is time-like, i.e., of indefinite extent. All other dimensions are space-like, i.e....