search for: underlimit

...h CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for best effort. Although delay does not look like being guaranteed at all for priority traffic. Eventually I would like to compare HTB with prio''s to CBQ with prio''s set. But HTB site says prio is only used for competing for unused (underlimited) class bandwidths. So please clarify wheather prio parameter has realy different meaning for CBQ and HTB? I dont know if what i expect from HTB CBQ (with respect to acting like PRIO scheduler) comparison makes any sense. regards adam f _______________________________________________ LARTC mai...

...p2p. 3) If a third class (ssh, web), starts to transmit, again, to take all the available bandwith except for the 20KB/s for p2p and 40 KB/s for ftp. etc... I have an upload link that varies from 700kbit to 1000kbit depending on the negotiation of the line. I wouldn''t like to artificially underlimit it to work properly, remember that I''m doing the shaping on the same router, on the real (nas0) interface, so in this case the speed of the interface is the speed of the link, and I think that it''s shouldn''t be necessary to slow down the upload speed... am I wrong? The c...

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).

Hi Stef and Alexey I have read some documents about CBQ algorithm from http://www.icir.org/floyd/cbq.html but still have some question about CBQ in Linux . 1. First estimator can estimate how much bandwidth already USED per class. one estimating algorithm is EWMA (exponential weighted moving average), how about Linux implemenatation about estimator? also do you have link for this algorithm? I

I notice one other small problem with my modified version of SFQ. The fact that packets can be dropped at dequeue time is incompatible with the way HTB (and probably CBQ and others modeled on it) keep statistics. When I fill a low rate queue causing packets to expire and be dropped at dequeue I get interesting statistics like this: This is my variant of SFQ qdisc plfq 8016: dev eth1 ... Sent