search for: underestimating

I forgot to ask a few more. Is there a relation between the hashtable ID /(parent,handle) so that if I used 2: for a hash table I could or couldn''t use 2: for a (parent,handle)ID? I also noticed that you type the hashtables like 2:2: can you have more levels with this? like 2:2:2:1: ? and I guess the same question with the parent/handles. thanks again. -- When dealing with a slow

...mated. This happens when using both the coxme<https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coxme/coxme.pdf> package, and the and frailty<https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/survival/versions/2.11-4/topics/frailty> statement in coxph. Questions: 1) Why is variance of the random effect underestimating when the random effect is on an individual level, is this a mathematical problem or a coding issue? 2) Is there any literature/R packages that look specifically at random effects applied on the observation level? Many thanks for any solutions/or references which may be helpful. Reproducible ex...

Life is like a mountain, the most important thing is not its height, but in witty; Life is like a rain, important is not its size, and in time. wholesalers (http://www.ebuybus.com)

I'm curious what happens if you feed an inaccurate value to 'expected loss'? Channel loss rate isn't always easy to measure, esp. in real time. I'm trying to figure out, ultimately, is it a better strategy to put the worse case expected loss in there, or more like the best case? (dealing with audio/full bandwidth here) thanks, Marc

FYI. -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/

Hi Jason, On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer > size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one > buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct > the comment before XDP linearizing. > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com> >

Hi Jason, On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer > size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one > buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct > the comment before XDP linearizing. > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com> >

On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. While at it, can you call "env python2" in the shebang line? It makes it a lot easier for Python3 systems, li...

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > Solves blinking on reclocking memory. The value set is an underestimate, but with non-reduced vblanking this should give us plenty of time Hey Roy, I've merged all (squashed the kepler change into the commit where it's needed too) except this patch, which needs to be rebased on top of 3.17-rc.

Hello Guys, I''ll like to suggest a small release fix before we start doing big changes: platform fixes. Current we''re setting MSWIN32 (mswin32) as platform for Windows gem, but we should be using Gem::Platform::CURRENT instead (i386-mswin32 as current Ruby windows implementation). Also, the jruby/java platform need to be defined. That change will ease the compatibility path

R-Listers. The following is a rant originally sent privately to Frank Harrell in response to remarks he made on this list. The ideas are not new or original, but he suggested I share it with the list, as he felt that it might be of wider interest, nonetheless. I have real doubts about this, and I apologize in advance to those who agree that I should have kept my remarks private. In view of this,

I am using Rspec 1.1.2 on Windows XP SP2 I am receiving the following error when I run ''rake spec'' from a brand new project: C:/SVN_Projects/rspec/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:107:in `colour='': You must gem install win32console to use colour on Windows (RuntimeError) I have the win32console gem installed and the error still occurs. It seems that the

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:19:04 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > XDP_REDIRECT support for mergeable buffer was removed since commit > 7324f5399b06 ("virtio_net: disable XDP_REDIRECT in receive_mergeable() > case"). This is because we don't reserve enough tailroom for struct > skb_shared_info which breaks XDP assumption. Other complaints are, the >

All, Mongrel 1.1.3 Rails 2.0.2 Ruby 1.8.6 Windows XP SP2 When I issue the command "ruby script/server" from any of my Rails projects on v. 2.0.2, I get a Windows dialog with the error: "The application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem." I''ve gone through the process of attempting to introduce

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. -- Sean Silva On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > This sounds like...

...directly and performs a type cast (if necessary) Is this intended? Am I missing something that read_attribute is doing that is not appropriate for a defined attribute reader method? It''s near trivial to draft a patch for this - however, I wanted to make sure I wasn''t vastly underestimating something. Comments? Thanks everyone! -- Jeff Hall Technology Consultant Digital Maelstrom Email: jeff.hall@digitalmaelstrom.net Jabber/XMPP: jeff.hall@digitalmaelstrom.net

On Nov 25, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Declan Kelly <flac-dev at groov.ie> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:29:33AM -0800, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: >> >> CVE-2014-9028 : Heap buffer write overflow >> CVE-2014-8962 : Heap buffer read overflow > > Is it known what other FLAC decoding software or firmware is vulnerable > to these overflows? > >

I think Rails 2.1 introduced a bug when eager loading of associations with Oracle. In 2.1 ActiveRecord loads the included table with a big ''IN'' query: ''where association.id in (1, 2, 3, 4...)''. The problem is that Oracle has a hard limit of 1000 values in an IN clause. I get this error: ''OCIError: ORA-01795: maximum number of expressions in a list

This sounds like a good idea to me! I can’t think of any common platform where you can’t get 2.7. Lets get rid of that legacy cruft! > On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me. Chris? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, 8:40 PM Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at