search for: underestim

...for a hash table I could or couldn''t use 2: for a (parent,handle)ID? I also noticed that you type the hashtables like 2:2: can you have more levels with this? like 2:2:2:1: ? and I guess the same question with the parent/handles. thanks again. -- When dealing with a slow pipe, never underestimate the throughput of the postal system. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...tions to check that I could estimate the variance of such random effects consistently with no bias. When the random effect is applied on the group level (shared frailty model), the variance of the random effect can be calculated. When the random effect is on an observation level, it is consistently underestimated. This happens when using both the coxme<https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coxme/coxme.pdf> package, and the and frailty<https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/survival/versions/2.11-4/topics/frailty> statement in coxph. Questions: 1) Why is variance of the random effect u...

Life is like a mountain, the most important thing is not its height, but in witty; Life is like a rain, important is not its size, and in time. wholesalers (http://www.ebuybus.com)

I'm curious what happens if you feed an inaccurate value to 'expected loss'? Channel loss rate isn't always easy to measure, esp. in real time. I'm trying to figure out, ultimately, is it a better strategy to put the worse case expected loss in there, or more like the best case? (dealing with audio/full bandwidth here) thanks, Marc

FYI. -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/

Hi Jason, On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer > size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one > buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct > the comment before XDP linearizing. > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>...

Hi Jason, On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer > size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one > buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct > the comment before XDP linearizing. > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend at intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>...

On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. While at it, can you call "env python2" in the shebang line? It makes it a lot easier for Python3 system...

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > Solves blinking on reclocking memory. The value set is an underestimate, but with non-reduced vblanking this should give us plenty of time Hey Roy, I've merged all (squashed the kepler change into the commit where it's needed too) except this patch, which needs to be rebased on top of 3.17-rc. There's one minor nitpick inline too. Please also try and...

...is. I hope it pays me attention (on the contrary of Ryan Davis that just ignores my patches since september!) :-P Regards guys and talk later. Nice weekend everybody. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. Douglas Adams

...uncertainty," we're always kidding ourselves and our colleagues because we fail to take into account the considerable variability introduced by our initial subjective exploration and subsequent choice of modeling strategy. One can only say (at best) that the stated model uncertainty is an underestimate of the true uncertainty. And very likely a considerable underestimate because of the model choice subjectivity. Now I in no way wish to discourage or abridge data exploration; only to point out that we statisticians have promulgated a self-serving and unrealistic view of the value of formal inf...

I am using Rspec 1.1.2 on Windows XP SP2 I am receiving the following error when I run ''rake spec'' from a brand new project: C:/SVN_Projects/rspec/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:107:in `colour='': You must gem install win32console to use colour on Windows (RuntimeError) I have the win32console gem installed and the error still occurs. It seems that the

...+ int err; > > head_skb = NULL; > > rcu_read_lock(); > xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog); > if (xdp_prog) { > - struct page *xdp_page; > struct xdp_buff xdp; > void *data; > u32 act; > > - /* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated */ > + /* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated > + * or headroom is not enough because of the buffer > + * was refilled before XDP is set. In both cases, > + * for simplicity, we will offload them to generic > + * XDP routine. This should only happen for th...

All, Mongrel 1.1.3 Rails 2.0.2 Ruby 1.8.6 Windows XP SP2 When I issue the command "ruby script/server" from any of my Rails projects on v. 2.0.2, I get a Windows dialog with the error: "The application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem." I''ve gone through the process of attempting to introduce

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. -- Sean Silva On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > This sounds...

...directly and performs a type cast (if necessary) Is this intended? Am I missing something that read_attribute is doing that is not appropriate for a defined attribute reader method? It''s near trivial to draft a patch for this - however, I wanted to make sure I wasn''t vastly underestimating something. Comments? Thanks everyone! -- Jeff Hall Technology Consultant Digital Maelstrom Email: jeff.hall@digitalmaelstrom.net Jabber/XMPP: jeff.hall@digitalmaelstrom.net

On Nov 25, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Declan Kelly <flac-dev at groov.ie> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:29:33AM -0800, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote: >> >> CVE-2014-9028 : Heap buffer write overflow >> CVE-2014-8962 : Heap buffer read overflow > > Is it known what other FLAC decoding software or firmware is vulnerable > to these overflows? > >

...The problem is that Oracle has a hard limit of 1000 values in an IN clause. I get this error: ''OCIError: ORA-01795: maximum number of expressions in a list is 1000 Of course getting 1000 records in one shot is probably too many; you''d want to paginate. But still sometimes you underestimate the size your db will grow too, and a really slow query is better than one that blows up. Has anyone else noticed this problem and is there a simple solution? I know that I can specify a dummy order by or conditions clause on the included table to force a normal join, but I''d have to c...

This sounds like a good idea to me! I can’t think of any common platform where you can’t get 2.7. Lets get rid of that legacy cruft! > On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me. Chris? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, 8:40 PM Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at