search for: underatanding

Hi, We have around 60 hosts and each of them acts as glusterFs clients as well as server. To achieve HA, my underatanding is that we can use Ganesha NFS alone (and not Kernel NFS) and for above 3.10 versions, the HA packages are not ready yet. So, I'm thinking if I can avoid HA by making each client acts as server for itself. i.e.,the server name specified while mounting is localhost. So, if a host have issues,...

Hi all, I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one help me in underatanding the issue? Regards, Jeevan. On Dec 21, 2017 8:20 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but > the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle error. >...

...gfid could not be found. Does repeating the "rm -rf" delete the directory? Regards, Nithya On 3 January 2018 at 12:16, Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I haven't found any root cause or workaround for this yet. Can any one > help me in underatanding the issue? > > Regards, > Jeevan. > > On Dec 21, 2017 8:20 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but >> the directory was not deleted...

Hi, After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle error. After 18 minutes, I'm able to delete the directory. So could anyone help me in knowing what could have happened or when in general I get such errors. The following is NFS log: [2017-12-21 13:56:01.592256] I [MSGID: 108019]

Hi Ben, Yes, I was referring to the same link before and I think most of the FOPS I've understood from the definitions there and I'll update if I found any corrections or new definitions. Btw, my previous underatanding about LOOKUP is wrong, its NOT dns lookup. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 14, 2017 11:02 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: Here is some of the ones we collected: https://github.com/bengland2/gluster-profile-analysis It doesn't have some of the ones you are looking fo...

...Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 15, 2017 10:07 AM, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com> wrote: Hi, On 11/14/2017 11:45 PM, Jeevan Patnaik wrote: > Hi, > > We have around 60 hosts and each of them acts as glusterFs clients as well > as server. > > To achieve HA, my underatanding is that we can use Ganesha NFS alone (and > not Kernel NFS) and for above 3.10 versions, the HA packages are not ready > yet. > > So, I'm thinking if I can avoid HA by making each client acts as server > for itself. > > i.e.,the server name specified while mounting is local...