search for: underappreci

On 24/02/15 10:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > didnt we have the problem with backend to RID, > that the user ID wasnt always the same on different member servers. > and to keep that in line you had to copy the idmap.db to the other server? > > Or am i mixing up other things now. > > Best regards, > > Louis > Yes, you are mixing things up now :-D idmap.ldb is only

...Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: dinsdag 24 februari 2015 12:14 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Winbind backend : rid is too much >underappreciated > >On 24/02/15 10:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> didnt we have the problem with backend to RID, >> that the user ID wasnt always the same on different member servers. >> and to keep that in line you had to copy the idmap.db to the >other server? >> >> Or...

On 21/02/15 20:05, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be made? > > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. Having to manually edit uids/gids in UNI...

Hello Miguel, Am 21.02.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a > Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned > to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. What problems did you had to get it running? I find it simple to setup. And there's documentation about it in the Wiki, too. For

Am 21.02.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do you > see? It simply works! _My_ personal disadvantage with idmap_rid is, that you have to define stuff like the shell on a per server and not on a per user base. You can decite if _all_ users should have /bin/bash or alle /bin/false. RFC2307 allows you to centralized set

On 21/02/15 22:23, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it >> isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head >> around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have >> problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > What kind of problems can

> > Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do

I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be made? After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. Having to manually edit uids/gids in UNIX Attribu...

> Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. What kind of problems can you have? I did it with these lines: idmap config *

> > > > idmap config * :backend = tdb > > idmap config * :range = 10000-99999 > > idmap config DOMAIN : backend = rid > > idmap config DOMAIN : range = 100000-199999 > > > > Taking your example 'idmap config DOMAIN : range = 100000-199999' it is > very easy, you just need users whose RIDs are larger than 200000, these > users will be

Am 22.02.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much >> underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be >> made? >> >> After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a >> Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the >> rid backend and voil! all my problems are gone. Having...

On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much > underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be > made? > > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a > Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the > rid backend and voil! all my problems are gone. Having to manually > e...

Hi, I have noticed the following: > a <- array(1:4, c(2, 2)) > A <- array(1:4, c(2,2,2)) > A + a Error in A + a : non-conformable arrays It works with a matrix + a vector, why doesn't it work with arrays? Am I missing something? How would you do the above operation efficiently (ie I need to add a matrix to each "plane" of 3-dim array)? At the moment I am using

...ject repository > is maintained at a granularity of one subproject commit per commit to > the corresponding directory in the monorepository (i.e. full history is > maintained). > > Thanks for you work on this. This kind of work is crucially important > but often unrecognized and underappreciated. > Thanks :) If you have any input on parts of the document that can be made more clear, feel free to chime in in the review. -- Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160908/83f13...

Hello, I am working on some examples of GLMM for my students but I am afraid that my way of preparing a dataframe to pass to lmer will make them think that R is a very difficult and un-natural language. Here is for example a simple data set about approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals. > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1,

R Folk: Please forgive what I'm sure is a fairly na?ve question; I hope it's clear. A colleague and I have been doing a really simple one-off survival analysis, but this is an area with which we are not very familiar, we just happen to have gathered some data that needs this type of analysis. We've done quite a bit of reading, but answers escape us, even though the question below

Hi, > On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:30 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> Right, we actually have a proposal to take what is in the current SVN >> repo here: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/ and migrate this to a >> single repository. >> I was not sure if you were referring to this proposal

+100 to Mehdi. Large scale cleanups should not only be welcome, they should be encouraged. This is the type of work that almost nobody wants to do and is sorely underappreciated (as evidenced by the fact that this thread even exists, IMHO). Code quality and code health are ongoing costs, and if we raise the barrier to entry for this type of change, then they're not going to happen. Why should we be requiring pre-commit review for cleanup changes? That doesn'...

We''re pleased to announce version 0.0.3 of Net::LDAP, the first pure-Ruby LDAP library. Net::LDAP intends to be a feature-complete LDAP client which can access as much as possible of the functionality of the most-used LDAP server implementations. This library does not wrap any existing native-code LDAP libraries, creates no Ruby extensions, and has no dependencies external to Ruby.

Hi, I am unable to install tibble, a required package for ggplot2 in R. I am running R (version 3.3.2 ) in RStudio (version 1.0.44). My OS is ubuntu 14.04 (64 bits). I get the same error when running R from the terminal. Any help would be gretly appreciated. Kind regards, Terje **************** Error messages: **************** install.packages("tibble") Installing package into