search for: uncovers

I am failing to uncover Sweave chunks step by step using the LaTeX beamer class. The following minimal example: \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} \begin{frame}[fragile] In the year \uncover<2->{25}\uncover<3->{\Sexpr{5*5}} \uncover<4->{ <<echo=TRUE, print=TRUE>>= 5*5*101 @ } \end{frame} \end{document} leads to an error message when

Hi All, I wanted to share a couple of updates on the effort to uncover non-determinism in LLVM through reverse iteration. 1. Reverse iteration has now been enabled for DenseMap (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35043) 2. We have setup a nightly reverse iteration buildbot (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/reverse-iteration). This builds all LLVM targets with reverse iteration ON and runs ninja

Thought this might interest a few people on the asterisk list as well Cheers, Dean ________________________________ From: Dean Collins Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:49 PM To: 'newtech-1 at meetup.com' Subject: RE: [newtech-1] Uncovering Spoken Phrases in Encrypted Voice over IP Conversations Wow, of course how stupid, when someone says hello at the start of the call

Hi Friends, I have a data frame X, and I want to add ?%? & ?$? in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. Can anyone help me out on this. X: Summary G Y R T Accts 582 644 0 1226 AcctCov 230 165 0 395 Cov% 40 26 0 32 UnCov% 60 74 0 68 EqVol11$MM8.5 10.6 0 19.1 Using this logic:

Hi all, Last year I had shared with the community my findings about instances of non-determinism in llvm codegen. The major source of which was the iteration of unordered containers resulting in non-deterministic iteration order. In order to uncover such instances we had introduced "reverse iteration" of unordered containers (currently only enabled for SmallPtrSet). I would now

Fix build error uncovered with c/s 25149 when compiling tools w/o MEMSHR. Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hi Friends, I'm new to R ,I have a data frame Z16 which is genarated from another data frame, and I want to add ?%? & ?$? in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. I'm using R 2.14.2 Version Can anyone help me out on this. Note: Initially i used tranfrom function to do some calculations,where ever it should give zero,its

On 30 August 2017 at 18:51, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM Grang, Mandeep Singh via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I wanted to share a couple of updates on the effort to uncover >> non-determinism in LLVM through reverse iteration. >>

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > > Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev > > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 AM > > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > Subject: [llvm-dev]

Can anyone help me find a code coverage tool in ruby? What I want is: given a set of tests that I run, what lines of my code and what routines are covered. And also a list of uncovered routines and tests. I couldn''t find an open source one out there... -- www.kenlet.com

Should I delete them first? net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512) -> Domain Admins #NOTE - listed only one for clarity# # net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 unixgroup=root type=domain [2003/12/21 20:05:22, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_group_mapping_entry(1954) ldapsam_update_group_mapping_entry: No group to

Howdy, I''ve uncovered a bug in the constructor for TextCtrl (originally uncovered while using WxSugar but it appears to apply to WxRuby itself as well). Here''s the output from irb: # ------ irb(main):001:0> require ''wx''; irb(main):002:0* ctl =

On 6 July 2017 at 11:02, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Grang, Mandeep Singh wrote: >> I would like to hear the community's thoughts on these proposals. >From the perspective of the recent focused effort on reproducible builds, I think this is excellent. >> We ideally want to compare rel vs >> rel+asserts vs debug with Linux vs

How much of a priority is it to find codegen changes triggered by flags such as -g? As long as the effects are reliable between runs this shoud be really easy to attack using C-Reduce. I can look into it if this is important. John On 7/6/17 11:12 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: >> Out of curiosity >> what kinds of changes arise from the presence/absence of -g? (It's

FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for llvm/clang/clang-tools-extra/compiler-rt/libcxx/openmp/polly using our custom fink packaging scripts with the -DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION:BOOL=ON cmake option. There were no stage2/stage3 object file comparison failures or test suite regressions. I do have one question

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with >> stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for >>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote: > >> ... >> > I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon. >> > I haven't been able to build gcc 4.7.3 yet (prereq ppl build problems--I think that's why I stopped building gcc some time

Everyone, There is non-determinism in LLVM codegen in the following scenarios: 1. Between back-to-back runs of the same LLVM toolchain 2. Between Release vs Release+Asserts toolchains 3. Between Linux vs Windows toolchains The main reasons for the non-determinism in codegen are: 1. Iteration of unordered containers (like SmallPtrSet, DenseMap, etc) where the iteration order is undefined 2.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

All; Since I have interest in providing the capability for callers to speak the department, person or number they wish to call, as well as other IVR scenarios, I have been reviewing much of this lists email archives and searching the web for open source voice recognition that will work with the Asterisk PBX. What I am trying to determine, is what will it take to get it working on Asterisk? How