search for: uncovering

I am failing to uncover Sweave chunks step by step using the LaTeX beamer class. The following minimal example: \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} \begin{frame}[fragile] In the year \uncover<2->{25}\uncover<3->{\Sexpr{5*5}} \uncover<4->{ <<echo=TRUE, print=TRUE>>= 5*5*101 @ } \end{frame} \end{document} leads to an error message when

Hi All, I wanted to share a couple of updates on the effort to uncover non-determinism in LLVM through reverse iteration. 1. Reverse iteration has now been enabled for DenseMap (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35043) 2. We have setup a nightly reverse iteration buildbot (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/reverse-iteration). This builds all LLVM targets with reverse iteration ON and runs ninja

Thought this might interest a few people on the asterisk list as well Cheers, Dean ________________________________ From: Dean Collins Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:49 PM To: 'newtech-1 at meetup.com' Subject: RE: [newtech-1] Uncovering Spoken Phrases in Encrypted Voice over IP Conversations Wow, of course how stupid, when someone says hello at the start of the call it probably establishes a baseline to work from. It would make sense to start calls with a pass saying like "elephant" or some other nonsense that wo...

Hi Friends, I have a data frame X, and I want to add ?%? & ?$? in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. Can anyone help me out on this. X: Summary G Y R T Accts 582 644 0 1226 AcctCov 230 165 0 395 Cov% 40 26 0 32 UnCov% 60 74 0 68 EqVol11$MM8.5 10.6 0 19.1 Using this logic:

Hi all, Last year I had shared with the community my findings about instances of non-determinism in llvm codegen. The major source of which was the iteration of unordered containers resulting in non-deterministic iteration order. In order to uncover such instances we had introduced "reverse iteration" of unordered containers (currently only enabled for SmallPtrSet). I would now

Fix build error uncovered with c/s 25149 when compiling tools w/o MEMSHR. Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hi Friends, I'm new to R ,I have a data frame Z16 which is genarated from another data frame, and I want to add ?%? & ?$? in row 4 and 5 respectively. when I?m trying using below logic, I?m getting warning message. I'm using R 2.14.2 Version Can anyone help me out on this. Note: Initially i used tranfrom function to do some calculations,where ever it should give zero,its

On 30 August 2017 at 18:51, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM Grang, Mandeep Singh via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I wanted to share a couple of updates on the effort to uncover >> non-determinism in LLVM through reverse iteration. >>

...wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > > Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev > > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 AM > > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > Subject: [llvm-dev] Uncovering non-determinism in LLVM - The Next Steps > > > > Hi all, > > > > Last year I had shared with the community my findings about instances of > > non-determinism in llvm codegen. The major source of which was the > > iteration of unordered containers resulting in non...

Can anyone help me find a code coverage tool in ruby? What I want is: given a set of tests that I run, what lines of my code and what routines are covered. And also a list of uncovered routines and tests. I couldn''t find an open source one out there... -- www.kenlet.com

Should I delete them first? net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512) -> Domain Admins #NOTE - listed only one for clarity# # net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 unixgroup=root type=domain [2003/12/21 20:05:22, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_group_mapping_entry(1954) ldapsam_update_group_mapping_entry: No group to

Howdy, I''ve uncovered a bug in the constructor for TextCtrl (originally uncovered while using WxSugar but it appears to apply to WxRuby itself as well). Here''s the output from irb: # ------ irb(main):001:0> require ''wx''; irb(main):002:0* ctl =

On 6 July 2017 at 11:02, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Grang, Mandeep Singh wrote: >> I would like to hear the community's thoughts on these proposals. >From the perspective of the recent focused effort on reproducible builds, I think this is excellent. >> We ideally want to compare rel vs >> rel+asserts vs debug with Linux vs

How much of a priority is it to find codegen changes triggered by flags such as -g? As long as the effects are reliable between runs this shoud be really easy to attack using C-Reduce. I can look into it if this is important. John On 7/6/17 11:12 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: >> Out of curiosity >> what kinds of changes arise from the presence/absence of -g? (It's

FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for llvm/clang/clang-tools-extra/compiler-rt/libcxx/openmp/polly using our custom fink packaging scripts with the -DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION:BOOL=ON cmake option. There were no stage2/stage3 object file comparison failures or test suite regressions. I do have one question

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> FYI, I just successfully performed a 3-stage bootstrap with >> stage2/stage3 object file comparison on x86_64-apple-darwin16 for >>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote: > >> ... >> > I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon. >> > I haven't been able to build gcc 4.7.3 yet (prereq ppl build problems--I think that's why I stopped building gcc some time

Everyone, There is non-determinism in LLVM codegen in the following scenarios: 1. Between back-to-back runs of the same LLVM toolchain 2. Between Release vs Release+Asserts toolchains 3. Between Linux vs Windows toolchains The main reasons for the non-determinism in codegen are: 1. Iteration of unordered containers (like SmallPtrSet, DenseMap, etc) where the iteration order is undefined 2.

...l Message----- >>> > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >>> > Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev >>> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 AM >>> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> > Subject: [llvm-dev] Uncovering non-determinism in LLVM - The Next Steps >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Last year I had shared with the community my findings about instances >>> of >>> > non-determinism in llvm codegen. The major source of which was the >&gt...

...: 1) VoiceXML standards, and forums 2) OpenVXI - which supports VoiceXML, simulated speech, telephony 3) PublicVoiceXML 4) Sphinx - a Carnegie Mellon University Speech recognition project funded by DARPA >From what I can tell, I feel I am uncovering the tip of the ice berg and this may not be trivial. But it seems that the Voice recognition application, once developed, would have to be linked via an AGI to the asterisk dial plan. Has anyone gotten Voice recognition working with Asterisk? Last I saw, a few were attempting to apply Sphinx back...