Displaying 20 results from an estimated 99 matches for "unconvincing".
Did you mean:
convincing
2011 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Talin wrote:
> Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for ConstantVector, there's an assert:
>
> assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
> "Initializer for vector element doesn't match vector element type!");
>
> I would change this to:
>
>
2015 Feb 19
2
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
<dennisml at conversis.de> wrote:
> I think the problem is that you simply have to draw a distinction
> between technology and product.
> The rise of the Linux desktop will never happen because Linux is not a
> product but a technology and as a result has to be a jack of all trades.
I'm unconvinced. True, Chromebooks
2011 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Talin wrote:
>
> Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for
> ConstantVector, there's an assert:
>
> assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
> "Initializer for vector element doesn't
2019 Feb 21
2
[RFC] Vector Predication
Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> writes:
> I was not suggesting that you rely on pattern matching predication for
> correctness. As you point out, that's obviously incorrect. I was
> assuming that you have a correct but slow lowering for the select
> form. I was suggesting your ISEL attempt to use a predicated
> instruction where possible for performance.
2011 Jul 27
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for
ConstantVector, there's an assert:
assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
"Initializer for vector element doesn't match vector element
type!");
I would change this to:
ASSERT_STRM(C->getType() == T->getElementType(),
"Initializer for vector element "
2016 Aug 31
2
Memory scope proposal
> On Aug 30, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [Sorry for chiming in so late.]
>
> I understand why a straightforward metadata scheme won't work here,
> but have you considered an alternate scheme that works in the
> following way:
>
> - We add a MD node called !nosynch that lists a set of
2015 Feb 20
0
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
On 19.02.2015 19:41, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote:
>> I think the problem is that you simply have to draw a distinction
>> between technology and product.
>> The rise of the Linux desktop will never happen because Linux is not a
>> product but a technology and as a result has to
2019 Feb 07
2
[RFC] Vector Predication
Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> writes:
>> Masking has advantages even in the default non-trapping fp
>> environment: It is not uncommon for fp hardware to be slow on
>> denormal values. If you take the operation + select approach,
>> spurious computation on denomals could occur, slowing down the
>> program.
> Why? If you're backend has
2005 Aug 02
8
An initial look at Trails
I''m posting this here because I''m sure that there are a few Rails fans
here who are stuck in Java land at work and willing to consider Trails
as a compromise. ( Web version here:
http://weblog.masukomi.org/index.pl/view/trails )
First let me set the stage I love [Rails](http://www.rubyonrails.com)
but I work in a Java shop. There are two of us here but I''m the only
one
2024 Jun 29
2
\>
Hi, Duncan:
On 6/29/24 17:24, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> ????? Yes. I'm not yet facile with "|>", but I'm learning.
>>
>>
>> ????? Spencer Graves
>
> There's very little to know.? This:
>
> ???? x |> f() |> g()
>
> is just a different way of writing
>
> ??? g(f(x))
>
> If f() or g() have extra
2007 Jun 11
2
Column sort of checkboxes
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I''ve gleaned a lot of good advice from reading this group and I''m
hoping for more
2011 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Talin wrote:
>> Because the stream is a raw_ostream, LLVM types and values can easily be printed to the stream without having to convert them to string form.
>
> I'm unconvinced that this is worth it at all. This is only going to allow you to "avoid going into the debugger" in the most trivial cases.
>
> Question - are you opposed to
2018 Apr 19
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Implementing -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in clang
On 19 April 2018 at 22:36, Manoj Gupta via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I was looking around for the cases where AddrSpace !=0 are checked. Seems
> like there are a bunch of optimizations that will fail to apply for non zero
> address spaces.
Isn't that exactly what we want? Did you look in enough detail to
determine that these optimizations *should* have
2007 Oct 17
7
[VTD][RESEND]add a timer for the shared interrupt issue for vt-d
Keir,
It''s a resending patch for the timeout mechanism to deal with the shared
interrupt issue for vt-d enabled hvm guest.
We modify the patch following your comments last time and make some
other small fix:
1) We don''t touch the locking around the hvm_dpci_eoi().
2) Remove the HZ from the TIME_OUT_PERIOD macro which may confuse
others.
3) Add some
2005 Mar 02
4
Development without server restart?
I thought that Rails was supposed to allow development of an
application *without* having to restart the webserver? I know this
works in WEBRick ... but this doesn''t seem to be the case in Apache
(linux). Am I missing something here, or does this only work in
webrick?
I suppose one should argue that for development you should just use
webrick, but this wasn''t an option for me
2008 Dec 17
36
[Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part
--
Juergen Gross Principal Developer
IP SW OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 636 47950
Fujitsu Siemens Computers e-mail: juergen.gross@fujitsu-siemens.com
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 Internet: www.fujitsu-siemens.com
D-81739 Muenchen Company details: www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
_______________________________________________
2019 Mar 18
6
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:55 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:22 AM Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/15/19 10:58 AM, David Greene wrote:
>> > Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at
2019 Mar 15
5
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
On 3/15/19 10:58 AM, David Greene wrote:
> Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 15:30, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> I've talked with a number of people about this as well, and I think that
>>> I understand the objections. I'm happy that ARM followed through with
2020 Aug 07
2
[RFC] Zeroing Caller Saved Regs
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:18 AM David Chisnall
<David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I think it would be useful for the discussion to have a clear threat model that this intends to defend against and a rough analysis of the security benefits that this is believed to bring.
I view this as being even more about a ROP defense. Dealing with spill
slots is, IMO, a separate issue, more
2018 Apr 19
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Implementing -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in clang
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:59 AM Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> On 4/19/2018 11:57 AM, Friedman, Eli via cfe-dev wrote:
>
> On 4/19/2018 11:48 AM, Manoj Gupta via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:54 PM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM Friedman, Eli <efriedma at