Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unconditin".
Did you mean:
uncondition
2015 Apr 13
3
[PATCH 2/2] virtio-balloon: virtio 1 support
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:00:48 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. At some point we'll
> likely define an incompatible interface with a different ID and
> different semantics. But for now, it's not a big effort to support a
> transitional balloon device: this has the advantage of
2015 Apr 13
3
[PATCH 2/2] virtio-balloon: virtio 1 support
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:00:48 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. At some point we'll
> likely define an incompatible interface with a different ID and
> different semantics. But for now, it's not a big effort to support a
> transitional balloon device: this has the advantage of
2015 Apr 13
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio-balloon: virtio 1 support
...point is to avoid setting bad precedent for virtio 1 devices.
It does have a bit of cost for transitional devices.
> Without that, you wouldn't need the above change at all,
> would you?
I think so, yes. BTW I suspect the stats code is broken for
cross-endian platforms: it should do LE unconditinally,
should it not?
> Also, doesn't get_features need to be modified as well so that
> VERSION_1 is advertised?
virtio_pci_device_plugged seems to set it ATM. I'll re-test to confirm.
--
MST