search for: uncoded

On 05-06-13 00:27, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Martijn van Beurden wrote: >> Considering flac.sourceforge.net, is this ever going to be updated? In >> case it should be redirected, I checked on my own sourceforge project >> webpage, adding the following two lines to .htaccess should redirect >> traffic to any resource on flac.sourceforge.net to xiph.org/flac >>

As I understand it the current plan is to make it possible to losslessly transcode VP3 video to Theora video. In my experience, one of the "features" of VP3 is it drops frames in the event that there is little/no movement in a frame, or if "drop frames" is enabled, to drop frames if the data rate is getting too high. I understand that the way that VP3 does this in

Hi. I have been working on a tool whose goal is to reduce the bit rate of theora video by decoding to DCT coefficients, reducing the entropy of the coefficients, and re-tokenizing the stream. I have successfully used the decoder source to extract the DCT coefficients for each block, and I am able to capture any and all relevant information about where the block of coefficients falls in the

Dear all, RQDA is a package for computer-aided qualitative data analysis, currently supporting plain text as qualitative data. It supports various operations in the grounded theory tradition such as coding, retrieval of codings, categorisation, attributes etc. It can also be used for content analysis and similar analysis, the result of which can be exported to be analysed in quantitative or

Dear all, RQDA is a package for computer-aided qualitative data analysis, currently supporting plain text as qualitative data. It supports various operations in the grounded theory tradition such as coding, retrieval of codings, categorisation, attributes etc. It can also be used for content analysis and similar analysis, the result of which can be exported to be analysed in quantitative or

Hi all, Does Theora Community have an interest in a multi-thread decoder implementation? I'm starting to work with multi-thread and I thought that Theora Decoder is a good choice for me, because I had been working with it in a FPGA implementation and I have experience with the library. I'm thinking in working with LoopFilter at first. Do you think I could start with it or there is a

...ind, passwd, endpwent, not found Apr 20 18:35:22 bert -su: NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, passwd, endpwent, not found and maillog: Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticate: decoded response: michael Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticate: uncoded challenge: Password: Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: > ernie.bio2.RWTH-Aachen.DE[134.130.63.5]: 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: < ernie.bio2.RWTH-Aachen.DE[134.130.63.5]: UjZvYTBmSENUSlBvaA== Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticat...

...ind, passwd, endpwent, not found Apr 20 18:35:22 bert -su: NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, passwd, endpwent, not found and maillog: Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticate: decoded response: michael Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticate: uncoded challenge: Password: Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: > ernie.bio2.RWTH-Aachen.DE[134.130.63.5]: 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: < ernie.bio2.RWTH-Aachen.DE[134.130.63.5]: UjZvYTBmSENUSlBvaA== Apr 20 18:34:57 bert postfix/smtpd[2525]: smtpd_sasl_authenticat...

...s > section) to refer to categorical factor. I will again point to this > sentence, from page 40, in the same section and referring to the behavior > under question, that shows F_j is not limited to categorical factors: > "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. > Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it remains > valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than > categorical." > > Note the "... whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than categorical." > Factor here is u...

Hi, I ran a small data set from a factorial experiment through R, Minitab and JMP... the result from R is significantly different from what Minitab or JMP give... The data set is at the following link: http://www.personal.psu.edu/nug107/Uploads/2x3_16repsANOVA.txt The first 5 columns are the factors and the next three are responses. In particular, for the response beta11MSE, two of the

...actor. I will again point to this >> > sentence, from page 40, in the same section and referring to the >> > behavior >> > under question, that shows F_j is not limited to categorical factors: >> > "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. >> > Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it >> > remains >> > valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather >> > than >> > categorical." >> > >> > Note the "... whenever any o...

On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 20:36 +0000, Noel Power wrote: > Hi > > On 09/11/2018 10:21, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 11:46 +0300, Taner Tas via samba wrote: > > > > I just tested Samba 4.9.2 on one of my DCs, previously running > > > > version 4.8.6. Immediately after install, I ran "samba-tool dbcheck" > > > > and got

...f T_{i(j)} has appeared in the > formula and by dummy variables if it has not" > > Here, F_j refers to a factor (variable) in a model and not a categorical > factor, as specified later in that section (page 40): "Numeric variables > appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. Therefore, the rule does > not do anything special for them, and it remains valid, in a trivial sense, > whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than categorical." > > Going back to my original example with three variables: X1 (numeric), X2 > (numeric), X3 (categorical). This...

...t use factor (in this section) to refer to categorical factor. I will again point to this sentence, from page 40, in the same section and referring to the behavior under question, that shows F_j is not limited to categorical factors: "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it remains valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than categorical." Note the "... whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than categorical." Factor here is used in the more general sense...

...to refer to categorical factor. I will again point to this > > sentence, from page 40, in the same section and referring to the behavior > > under question, that shows F_j is not limited to categorical factors: > > "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. > > Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it remains > > valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than > > categorical." > > > > Note the "... whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than > categorica...

...point to this > >> > sentence, from page 40, in the same section and referring to the > >> > behavior > >> > under question, that shows F_j is not limited to categorical factors: > >> > "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. > >> > Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it > >> > remains > >> > valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather > >> > than > >> > categorical." > >> > > >> &gt...

I just tested Samba 4.9.2 on one of my DCs, previously running version 4.8.6. Immediately after install, I ran "samba-tool dbcheck" and got the following: Checking 511 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 25: ordinal not in range(128)   File

...is coded by contrasts if T_{i(j)} has appeared in the formula and by dummy variables if it has not" Here, F_j refers to a factor (variable) in a model and not a categorical factor, as specified later in that section (page 40): "Numeric variables appear in the computations as themselves, uncoded. Therefore, the rule does not do anything special for them, and it remains valid, in a trivial sense, whenever any of the F_j is numeric rather than categorical." Going back to my original example with three variables: X1 (numeric), X2 (numeric), X3 (categorical). This heuristic prescribes en...

Hello Tyler, I want to bring to your attention the following document: "What happens if you omit the main effect in a regression model with an interaction?" (https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/faq/what-happens-if-you-omit-the-main-effect-in-a-regression-model-with-an-interaction). This gives a useful review of the problem. Your example is Case 2: a continuous and a categorical regressor.