Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "uncoalesc".
Did you mean:
uncoalesced
2018 Aug 02
3
tdbtool repack fails
...largest padding: 5/412/252927
Number of dead records: 2
Smallest/average/largest dead records: 399912712/661866360/923820008
Number of free records: 38999
Smallest/average/largest free records: 12/18485/715170720
Number of hash chains: 10000
Smallest/average/largest hash chains: 26/66/116
Number of uncoalesced records: 253
Smallest/average/largest uncoalesced runs: 1/1/2
Percentage keys/data/padding/free/dead/rechdrs&tailers/hashes:
1/30/8/21/39/1/0
it ends with this error:
tdb_recovery_allocate: overflow recovery area
tdb_transaction_prepare_commit: failed to setup recovery data
../lib/tdb/com...
2018 Aug 02
0
tdbtool repack fails
...Number of dead records: 2
> Smallest/average/largest dead records: 399912712/661866360/923820008
> Number of free records: 38999
> Smallest/average/largest free records: 12/18485/715170720
> Number of hash chains: 10000
> Smallest/average/largest hash chains: 26/66/116
> Number of uncoalesced records: 253
> Smallest/average/largest uncoalesced runs: 1/1/2
> Percentage keys/data/padding/free/dead/rechdrs&tailers/hashes:
> 1/30/8/21/39/1/0
>
>
> it ends with this error:
>
> tdb_recovery_allocate: overflow recovery area
> tdb_transaction_prepare_commit:...
2024 Nov 21
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 21/11/24 14:11, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
>> On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Not much unfortunately.
>>
>> Running this:
>>
>> net cache list
>>
>> will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with
>> real
2018 Aug 30
0
gencache.tdb size and cache flush
...ding: 13/25/106
> Number of dead records: 1
> Smallest/average/largest dead records: 823272/823272/823272
> Number of free records: 15
> Smallest/average/largest free records: 12/1420/20824
> Number of hash chains: 10000
> Smallest/average/largest hash chains: 0/1/8
> Number of uncoalesced records: 1
> Smallest/average/largest uncoalesced runs: 1/1/1
> Percentage keys/data/padding/free/dead/rechdrs&tailers/hashes: 30/11/14/1/30/15/1
> root at filur01:/var/samba/cache # ls -l gencache.tdb
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2723840 Aug 30 10:54 gencache.tdb
My guess woul...
2020 Aug 23
2
Looking for suggestions: Inferring GPU memory accesses
...Oh, I see what you mean now. Doing such analysis would be useful for a
thread block and not just a single thread but as you say you are onto
something bigger than just a thread.
We had published a short paper in ICS around this which uses polyhedral
techniques to do such analysis and reason about uncoalesced access patterns
in Cuda programs. You can find paper at
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2464996.2467288
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020, 11:00 PM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Ees,
>
> a while back we started a project with similar scope.
> Unf...
2018 Aug 29
2
gencache.tdb size and cache flush
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:36:23PM +0200, Peter Eriksson via samba wrote:
> For what it’s worth you are not alone in seeing similar problems with Samba and gencache.
>
> Our site has some 110K users (university with staff & students (including former ones), and currently around 2000 active (SMB) clients connecting to 5 different Samba servers (around 400-500 clients per server).
2019 Nov 14
1
get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY
...0
Smallest/average/largest padding: 4/1528/19120
Number of dead records: 11146
Smallest/average/largest dead records: 416/2688/21816
Number of free records: 4049
Smallest/average/largest free records: 12/2579/6959332
Number of hash chains: 10007
Smallest/average/largest hash chains: 0/1/5
Number of uncoalesced records: 3473
Smallest/average/largest uncoalesced runs: 1/8/90
Percentage keys/data/padding/free/dead/rechdrs&tailers/hashes: 0/1/3/25/70/1/0
(Around 120k users in AD, around 1600 concurrent SMB users right now (on the server where this data is from), but we see this even on single-user ser...
2019 Nov 14
6
get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY
Upgraded to Samba 4.11.2 and I?ve now too started seeing the message:
get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY
A lot. I modified the source in source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c a bit in order to print out the values of the service path, smb_fname & old_write_time when it fails and it seems they are all NULL?
[2019/11/14 14:24:23.358441, 0]
2020 Aug 22
5
Looking for suggestions: Inferring GPU memory accesses
Hi all,
As part of my research I want to investigate the relation between the
grid's geometry and the memory accesses of a kernel in common gpu
benchmarks (e.g Rodinia, Polybench etc). As a first step i want to
answer the following question:
- Given a kernel function with M possible memory accesses. For how many of
those M accesses we can statically infer its location given concrete values