search for: uncloneable

...ntication. > > This is 2FA in that you need the private key and the passphrase for it. I don't agree - being able to unlock a private key is just part of "possessing" it. OTOH publickey+password authentication could be considered 2FA. Ideally with the key rendered practically uncloneable by holding it on a token, etc. -d

I''m writing an acts_as_* plugin and am trying to BDD it. Ideally my specs would look like: describe ActsAsCloneable, " basic cloning" do load_example_classes School.class_eval do acts_as_cloneable end before(:each) do @old_school = School.create! :name => "Baylake Pines", :city => "Virginia Beach", :guid => "abc123"

Adam Jackson (3): Update COPYING Death to ChangeLog xrandr 1.2.3 Brice Goglin (4): Add *current and +preferred to the --verbose output When invoked with no option, xrandr dumps existing modes Allow the same output to be specified several times on the command line Clarify the ability to manipulate multiple outputs in the manpage Matthias Hopf (13):

There has been some good discussion around our IBM security team as to what actually constitutes SSH multi factor authentication. There are 2 options being discussed. One, the Google Authenticator (OTP authentication). Two, Public/Private key authentication (pubkeyauthentication = yes) which supports pass phrase private key authentication. Which of these is considered multi-factor

...s 2FA in that you need the private key and the passphrase for it. > > I don't agree - being able to unlock a private key is just part of > "possessing" it. > > OTOH publickey+password authentication could be considered 2FA. Ideally > with the key rendered practically uncloneable by holding it on a token, > etc. > > -d > > > > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev