search for: uncesssary

...m cvs to some other software, you are going to put up another barrier for people to overcome before joining llvm. Learning llvm is a big enough task in itself and contrary to what you may believe.. its not globally known yet. Switching to something at this stage in the game is premature and an uncesssary headache. In my personal opinion, subversion is better with its features. But I'm skeptical to its stability since its so young. Waiting awhile to switch would give it a chance to mature and for the community to start switching over. -Tanya > >> >> -Tanya >> >>...

On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:34, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Considering that everyone is managing just fine with cvs, anything > discussed about the differences between cvs and *X* is not a show stopper. I would have used the term "coping just fine" with cvs. Yeah, it works. But, is it productive? efficient? easy? fast? .. none of those. There are better alternatives and that's

>> The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better >> version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what >> "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. > > I think before we begin discussing which software to use, we should discuss > what is really wrong with CVS (on a day to day basis) and