Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "uncentr".
Did you mean:
uncenter
2012 May 29
1
GAM interactions, by example
...score = 4.0288 Scale est. = 3.8082 n = 400
## note that the preceding fit is the same as....
b1<-gam(y ~ s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==1))+s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==2))+
s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==3))+s(x0)-1,data=dat)
## ... the `-1' is because the intercept is confounded with the
## *uncentred* smooths here.
plot(b1,pages=1)
summary(b1)
Family: gaussian
Link function: identity
Formula:
y ~ s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac == 1)) + s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac ==
2)) + s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac == 3)) + s(x0) - 1
Approximate significance of smooth terms:
edf Re...
2000 Jun 15
1
prcomp help: is this a typo?
Dear All,
The help for prcomp, under "Value" says:
sdev: the standard deviation of the principal components (i.e., the
eigenvalues of the cov matrix, though the calculation is
actually done with the singular values of the data matrix).
The way I read it, it implies that the sdev are the eigenvalues, but I think
that sdev is actually the square root of the
2012 May 29
1
strucchange Fstats() example
...score = 4.0288 Scale est. = 3.8082 n = 400
## note that the preceding fit is the same as....
b1<-gam(y ~ s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==1))+s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==2))+
s(x2,by=as.numeric(fac==3))+s(x0)-1,data=dat)
## ... the `-1' is because the intercept is confounded with the
## *uncentred* smooths here.
plot(b1,pages=1)
summary(b1)
Family: gaussian
Link function: identity
Formula:
y ~ s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac == 1)) + s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac ==
2)) + s(x2, by = as.numeric(fac == 3)) + s(x0) - 1
Approximate significance of smooth terms:
edf Re...
2003 Jul 23
6
Condition indexes and variance inflation factors
Has anyone programmed condition indexes in R?
I know that there is a function for variance inflation factors
available in the car package; however, Belsley (1991) Conditioning
Diagnostics (Wiley) notes that there are several weaknesses of VIFs:
e.g. 1) High VIFs are sufficient but not necessary conditions for
collinearity 2) VIFs don't diagnose the number of collinearities and 3)
No one has