search for: unbundling

On Dec 2, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > ---------------- > | Bundle * | (A MI with special opcode "Bundle") > ---------------- > | > ---------------- > | MI * | > ---------------- >

Jakob, >... In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or unbundle it > from the instructions you are trying to finalize. This is exactly my point - I have to unbundle everything to re-bundle it back in :) ...but this case is trivial and I am OK with it. What is more unclear to me is this. How do you use Bundle.insert(I, MI->removeFromBundle()) Where MI == Bundle.End?

On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:02 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Jakob, > >> ... In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or unbundle > it >> from the instructions you are trying to finalize. > > This is exactly my point - I have to unbundle everything to re-bundle it > back in :) ...but this case is trivial and I am

Let me redirect the topic a bit. I've been considering unbundling gregmisc. The pro would be that people would find the component packages (i.e. gdata) more easily. The con is that the packages have a number of interdependencies, so you pretty much will need to get most of them anyway. As the latest gregmisc bundle contains a gregmisc package that is just a stu...

Let me redirect the topic a bit. I've been considering unbundling gregmisc. The pro would be that people would find the component packages (i.e. gdata) more easily. The con is that the packages have a number of interdependencies, so you pretty much will need to get most of them anyway. As the latest gregmisc bundle contains a gregmisc package that is just a stu...

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 12:26 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 00:07 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > wrote: > > > > Am 2017-01-04 um 23:49 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > > > > > > > > > > on my way to 4.5.3 now > > > > compiling samba-4.5.3 on gentoo *failed* right now > > > >

Jakob, > The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from > the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a > global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but sound nevertheless. > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to

On Feb 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Jakob, > >> The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from >> the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a >> global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. > > This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but

On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:43 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in > bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger > of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from the old style a

Jakob, I have a question about the following (four) asserts recently added in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() (see below). What is the real danger of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? My problem with them happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to which I have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header with liveness abbreviation, but

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 10:45 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 2017-01-05 um 00:28 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > > > > > > > > In Debian we re-bundled heimdal.  Samba is only known to work and > > > is > > > only tested with the bundled copy.  The semi-private interfaces > > > we > > > use > > > with the

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:59:08AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > We ship our own copy of it, so we do not need the external version. > (Also, the latest upstream version of ocaml-libvirt was already not > usable to build the test harness of v2v.) This is a significant step backwards from a Fedora packaging POV which expects maintainers to unbundle any 3rd party deps and use the external

2018-01-18 6:40 GMT+01:00 Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org>: > Great, I think that that would be a fine approach: you can have the cmake logic detect which version of isl is installed and fail if it is the wrong version. This would address my concern. > The motivation explained in the original email seemed to hinge around the fact that Polly’s unit tests depend on accidental

Hello everyone, Let me (re)present a question that might have previously been discussed, but did not result in any code (AFIK). How do we represent a _conditional_ assignment (def) in a bundle MI? More contents - currently we expose internal def/use/kill information to a bundle header - something like this: BUNDLE %PC<imp-def>, %R0<imp-def>, %P0<imp-use,kill>,

Hello, I just learned this morning about a new patch from Sun for Solaris 8 that adds /dev/random. The patch is based on the device in Solaris 9. I have not tried it yet, but I though some might be interested. The patch is: (this is available for free from sunsolve) Patch-ID# 112438-01 Keywords: secuity random number generator PRNG Synopsis: SunOS 5.8: /kernel/drv/random patch Date: Mar/28/2002

Hi I read that bundles are to be deprecated in 2.10. The BACCO bundle contains three packages (emulator, calibrator, approximator) which I am happy to unbundle. But the 'BACCO' moniker has some considerable cachet for me in terms of recognizability (eg with grant-giving bodies), as it has become an umbrella term for a whole bunch of related statistical functionality of which the three

> On Jan 18, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > 2018-01-18 6:40 GMT+01:00 Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org>: >> Great, I think that that would be a fine approach: you can have the cmake logic detect which version of isl is installed and fail if it is the wrong version. This would address my concern. > >> The motivation

Jakob, Seems like an easy solution for this case... But let me ask you a more general question. The reason I kept on hanging on to the MBB->splice was (probably outdated) assumption that it will one day properly update liveness for instructions it moves... That is a serious matter for what I am trying to do (global code motion in presence of bundles). What is the current thinking? Will

Related to http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2016-November/290384.html, at the moment I'm passing one variable via DIAL. Now I'd like to pass a whole bunch, and my idea was to rather than having a great string of b(synctest3b^setVar^1(something)^2(more things)^3(etc)) and then get them with ARG1..ARGn etc, I could bundle the whole lot into a HASH and then unbundle them at

Hi All, Asterisk 1.4.12 CentOS 5 My ISP account includes nearly 500 minutes of VOIP calls per month but the service is expensive for unbundled minutes. So I'm trying to find a way to keep an accumulated total of calls made through that trunk so that I can automatically switch to a lower-cost provider when my bundled minutes are used. The plan is to store the accumulated time in AstDB and