search for: unbundl

...... I think you should turn the glue bit upside down, so it means "This instruction is glued to its predecessor" instead of "This instruction is glued to its successor. That way, the inner bundled instructions have the glue bit, while the outer bundle headers and unbundled instructions don't. That should make your iterator a lot simpler when you have mixed bundles and unbundled MIs. It simply skips MIs with the glue bit set: | ---------------- |--> | Bundle | (A MI with special opcode "Bundle")...

Jakob, >... In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or unbundle it > from the instructions you are trying to finalize. This is exactly my point - I have to unbundle everything to re-bundle it back in :) ...but this case is trivial and I am OK with it. What is more unclear to me is this. How do you use Bundle.insert(I, MI->removeFromBundle()) Where MI...

On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:02 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Jakob, > >> ... In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or unbundle > it >> from the instructions you are trying to finalize. > > This is exactly my point - I have to unbundle everything to re-bundle it > back in :) ...but this case is trivial and I am OK with it. What is more > unclear to me is this. > > How do you use Bundle.insert(...

Let me redirect the topic a bit. I've been considering unbundling gregmisc. The pro would be that people would find the component packages (i.e. gdata) more easily. The con is that the packages have a number of interdependencies, so you pretty much will need to get most of them anyway. As the latest gregmisc bundle contains a gregmisc package that is just a...

Let me redirect the topic a bit. I've been considering unbundling gregmisc. The pro would be that people would find the component packages (i.e. gdata) more easily. The con is that the packages have a number of interdependencies, so you pretty much will need to get most of them anyway. As the latest gregmisc bundle contains a gregmisc package that is just a...

...gt; only tested with the bundled copy.  The semi-private interfaces we > use > with the KDC have skewed and we rely on specific patches to be > applied > on the Heimdal side. > > The work to have Heimdal updated in Samba, so we can then port out > the > last few patches and unbundle it remains uncompleted.  The port to > MIT > kerberos is ongoing, but also not complete. For clarity, I speak here regarding the AD DC mode.  The file server has always supported the system MIT Krb5, and continues to do so as a fully supported option. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett...

...replace. > > > My problem with them > > happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to > > which I have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header > > with liveness abbreviation, but because of these asserts I now have > to > > unbundle all, and re-bundle them right back again for no obvious > benefit... > > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to work with pre-bundled instructions. FirstMI and > LastMI must be pointing at bundle boundaries, but you shouldn...

...; From here this assert is triggered. Yes, that sounds like correct behavior to me because FirstMI is pointing inside an existing bundle. I assume your intent is to remove the old BUNDLE header after finalizeBundle() inserted a new one. In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or unbundle it from the instructions you are trying to finalize. > Let me give you another example though. I have the following existing > bundle: > > v BUNDLE %R0<imp-def,dead>, %PC<imp-def>, %R18<imp-use> > *^v %R0<def> = AND_ri %R18, 128 > *^ JMP_EQriPn...

...nsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. > My problem with them > happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to which I > have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header with liveness > abbreviation, but because of these asserts I now have to unbundle all, and > re-bundle them right back again for no obvious benefit... finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, LastMI)' which ought to work with pre-bundled instructions. FirstMI and LastMI must be pointing at bundle boundaries, but you shouldn't need to unbun...

...the real danger of reasserting a connection even if it already exist? My problem with them happens when I try to call finalizeBundle() on an existing bundle to which I have added a new instruction. The goal - a new bundle header with liveness abbreviation, but because of these asserts I now have to unbundle all, and re-bundle them right back again for no obvious benefit... In other words, may I suggest removing them rather than adding new methods?... or do you have a better suggestion? Thanks. Sergei void MachineInstr::bundleWithPred() { assert(!isBundledWithPred() && "MI is alrea...

...> > with the KDC have skewed and we rely on specific patches to be > > > applied > > > on the Heimdal side. > > > > > > The work to have Heimdal updated in Samba, so we can then port > > > out > > > the > > > last few patches and unbundle it remains uncompleted.  The port > > > to > > > MIT > > > kerberos is ongoing, but also not complete. > > > > For clarity, I speak here regarding the AD DC mode.  The file > > server > > has always supported the system MIT Krb5, and continues to...

...cano wrote: > We ship our own copy of it, so we do not need the external version. > (Also, the latest upstream version of ocaml-libvirt was already not > usable to build the test harness of v2v.) This is a significant step backwards from a Fedora packaging POV which expects maintainers to unbundle any 3rd party deps and use the external packages instead. Why can't we just do a new release of ocaml-libvirt upstream and put that into Fedora (and other distros that care) straightaway. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: h...

...ed and fail if it is the wrong version. This would address my concern. > The motivation explained in the original email seemed to hinge around the fact that Polly’s unit tests depend on accidental details of ISL that change across releases. If you can fix that, then it seems more plausible to unbundle it. > > If you can’t fix that, and can’t replace ISL, then the best approach seems to have CMake detect and reject incompatible versions. This would require buildbot admins to regularly install new versions of isl. Isl implements the main loop optimization algorithms, so any change in isl...

...ch obviously changes the liveness update process. My question, do we need another attribute along with isImplicit and isEarlyClobber etc. to designate a conditional def? Furthermore, depending on architectural details we well might have a conditional use as well... and what about the individual (unbundled) def/use? Should this: %R0<def> = LDriuh_cdnNotPt %P0<kill,internal>, %R16, 0; ...become this: %R0<def-cond> = LDriuh_cdnNotPt %P0<kill,internal>, %R16, 0; or even: %R0<def-cond> = LDriuh_cdnNotPt %P0<kill,internal>, %R16<use-cond>, 0; So, if I am...

...is 9. I have not tried it yet, but I though some might be interested. The patch is: (this is available for free from sunsolve) Patch-ID# 112438-01 Keywords: secuity random number generator PRNG Synopsis: SunOS 5.8: /kernel/drv/random patch Date: Mar/28/2002 Solaris Release: 8 SunOS Release: 5.8 Unbundled Product: Unbundled Release: Xref: Topic: SunOS 5.8: /kernel/drv/random patch *********************************************************** NOTE: This patch may contain one or more OEM-specific platform ports. See the appropriate OEM_NOTES file within the patch for information specifi...

Hi I read that bundles are to be deprecated in 2.10. The BACCO bundle contains three packages (emulator, calibrator, approximator) which I am happy to unbundle. But the 'BACCO' moniker has some considerable cachet for me in terms of recognizability (eg with grant-giving bodies), as it has become an umbrella term for a whole bunch of related statistical functionality of which the three packages are examples. I make heavy use of the word "BA...

...il if it is the wrong version. This would address my concern. > >> The motivation explained in the original email seemed to hinge around the fact that Polly’s unit tests depend on accidental details of ISL that change across releases. If you can fix that, then it seems more plausible to unbundle it. >> >> If you can’t fix that, and can’t replace ISL, then the best approach seems to have CMake detect and reject incompatible versions. > > This would require buildbot admins to regularly install new versions of isl. It seems like you can choose how frequently to update....

...ect: Re: Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc() > > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:02 PM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > > > Jakob, > > > >> ... In this case you should either erase the old BUNDLE first, or > >> unbundle > > it > >> from the instructions you are trying to finalize. > > > > This is exactly my point - I have to unbundle everything to re-bundle > > it back in :) ...but this case is trivial and I am OK with it. What > is > > more unclear to me is this. > &g...

...l, at the moment I'm passing one variable via DIAL. Now I'd like to pass a whole bunch, and my idea was to rather than having a great string of b(synctest3b^setVar^1(something)^2(more things)^3(etc)) and then get them with ARG1..ARGn etc, I could bundle the whole lot into a HASH and then unbundle them at the called channel. Passing the HASH as a var isn't working (I wasn't expecting it to!) but is there any other way of doing this, or is it setVar for each one?

Hi All, Asterisk 1.4.12 CentOS 5 My ISP account includes nearly 500 minutes of VOIP calls per month but the service is expensive for unbundled minutes. So I'm trying to find a way to keep an accumulated total of calls made through that trunk so that I can automatically switch to a lower-cost provider when my bundled minutes are used. The plan is to store the accumulated time in AstDB and reset this with a cron job at the beginning o...