search for: unavialable

Why would you have a server (DC) that long powered off, it for sure will give delays and less response of the network. But you could turn it off as long as you want, once it powers up it will sync the AD again. So no, the controller is not removed from you domain. You need todo that manualy. I suggest you read: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC And not, dont forget if

I speak about working controller, not about powered off, but network segment doesn't available to other controllers, for pdc emulator, and controller is available for workstations at this network segment. 14.04.2020 13:00, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ?????: > Why would you have a server (DC) that long powered off, it for sure will give delays and less response of the network. > But you

HI Valery A DC is never "removed" automatically from AD, but, at least from the Windows perspective, the longest period would be the tombstone lifetime. After this has passed, the DC would have objects "lingering", as the deletion of an object could have already occurred at other DCs and then the marker of the deletion itself removed, which of course means there is no way

Hi, all. What is greatest period for AD DC (non FSMO) can be unavailable, for example, because network segment is unavailable for long time (3, 4 weeks)? Is the controller will be removed from AD automatically? And what to do after this network segment will become available? I have read about tombstoneLifeTime attribute of Directory Service (Configuration, Services, Windows NT), which default

...ackets outbound. I could''nt even ping the AP. Interestingly when I run a tcpdump I can see few broadcast packets on the interface. There no rules in iptables for nat or filter or mangle. Neither did I start /setup any bridge setup. strace on ping gives me "EAGAIN Resource temporarily unavialable" errors. Even with madwifi drivers and it is the same story. The drivers work perfectly on Fedora core 3 kernel. Am I missing something obvious ? Any help would be appreciated. Regards Syam _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource...

...user calls up w/ blocked caller id I get the following on my phone Incoming call from asterisk This is the same on my Cisco 7940s and Polycom phones. For average users this is not intuitive at all.. I'd like to configure this so if I deploy this at a customer site it says "caller id unavialable". With the spelling done right.... Any ideas on how this wold be accomplished? -- Rock River Internet Roger Grunkemeyer 202 W. State St, 8th Floor grunky@rockriver.net Rockford, IL 61101 815-968-9888 x102

...il at dobrich.net Background: debian woody, kernel 2.4.17 The problem is, when you set some resource limits in /etc/security/limits.conf for group X - nproc 20 ( maximum of running user processes - 20 ), and try to log with some user with group X, sshd says 'fork failed - resource temporary unavialable'. There are no other processes running for this user, and as far as i've seen, it makes something like authenticate-set limits-fork()-setuid() , and because there is a moment when it's running under root with really lowered limits, it bombs out. Any solutions? ------- You are rece...

I tried it w/ mine as well and it hung up on me because I just have Voicemail running not Voicemail2. It seems as though you have Voicemail2 because it's trying to play the Unavialable message. Just a thought though. Does it do the samething w/ [qout-phillyq] exten => 0,1,Voicemail(u1) exten => 0,2,Goto(default,s,1) Tim Thompson http://www.amatechtel.com (806) 722-2227 -----Original Message----- From: Todd Lieberman [mailto:todd@tlsolutions.net] Sent: Monday, No...

...ackets outbound. I could''nt even ping the AP. Interestingly when I run a tcpdump I can see few broadcast packets on the interface. There no rules in iptables for nat or filter or mangle. Neither did I start /setup any bridge setup. strace on ping gives me "EAGAIN Resource temporarily unavialable" errors. Even with madwifi drivers and it is the same story. The drivers work perfectly on Fedora core 3 kernel. Am I missing something obvious ? Any help would be appreciated. Regards Syam" ---(End Quote)--- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list X...