Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "unavailableblock".
Did you mean:
unavailableblocks
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
2015 Jul 15
4
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
...forms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ bool GVN::processNonLocalLoad(LoadInst *LI) {
}
// Step 4: Eliminate partial redundancy.
- if (!EnablePRE || !EnableLoadPRE)
+ if (!EnableLoadPRE)
return false;
return PerformLoadPRE(LI, ValuesPerBlock, UnavailableBlocks);
This will disable Scalar PRE without disabling load PRE.
(note, again, however, that load PRE can create exactly the same GEP
situation you are referring to)
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
2015 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
...calar/GVN.cpp
> @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ bool GVN::processNonLocalLoad(LoadInst *LI) {
> }
>
> // Step 4: Eliminate partial redundancy.
> - if (!EnablePRE || !EnableLoadPRE)
> + if (!EnableLoadPRE)
> return false;
>
> return PerformLoadPRE(LI, ValuesPerBlock, UnavailableBlocks);
>
>
>
>
> This will disable Scalar PRE without disabling load PRE.
>
>
> (note, again, however, that load PRE can create exactly the same GEP situation you are referring to)
>
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
2015 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ?
Hi, Daniel:
Thanks a lot for detailed background information, we are willing to provide the right fix, however it will take time, do you mind if you forward me the discussion you had 5 months ago? I may not be able to access it since I only joined ellvmdev list this week.
I did some performance measurement last night, some of our critical benchmark degraded up to 30% with your patch, so we have