search for: unassailable

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "unassailable".

2013 Sep 03
0
Re: ext3 / ext4 on USB flash drive?
>From the little I have heard about control systems for cars, which was some years ago, they were blockhead proprietary. The analogy would only work if computing was customarily blackbox technology, which it isn't. I'd be surprised if there were any branded flash drives that contained less than their advertised amount of storage. That leaves the question of what is going on under the
2015 Oct 13
2
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
...t this makes them an excellent resource on how to most effectively pursue this goal (and related goals). It's not research. Not on the actual effects of having a CoC. > Reading these and other resources is the research I did. I'm not claiming it is statistically significant or contains unassailable data. I do think it offers useful and relevant guidance for the community. Am 13.10.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev: > > Now, I understand that for many of you (in fact, I suspect for the > > overwhelming majority of you!) these details aren't necessary. As I ha...
2013 Aug 30
2
Re: ext3 / ext4 on USB flash drive?
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Mark Ballard wrote: > > This is incredible, Mr Sandeen. You mean USB flash manufacturers > (what's their body - the USB Implementer's Forum?) have simply not > provided a means for software to query the underlying hardware in a > USB flash? Have software producers asked them for this? No, they haven't. And yes we have, since
2008 Dec 14
19
regarding vpn server for 1500 clients
Hi list, I have to build vpn server for 1500 clients. No encryption necessary. can anyone please recommend me vpn server. I do not have experience on vpn. I have tested openvpn on my test setup, & its working fine. I want to check if there any other vpn server available. I have not checked but can pptp vpn be usefull? My requirement is to connect 1500 clients on vpn server. Need
2015 Oct 13
3
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
While I'm replying to Renato here, that is mostly because there are too many replies on this subject, and too many of them have wandered off into other topics. I want to specifically address the concerns with verbosity. For example: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:52 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > I also agree that some descriptions are too verbose, and trying to