search for: unapprov

...Base include Versionable # Some methods to handle my versioned objects has_many :versions, :class_name => "FooVersion", :foreign_key => "parent_id" belongs_to :curr, :class_name => "FooVersion", :foreign_key => "current_id" belongs_to :unapproved, :class_name => "FooVersion", :foreign_key => "unapproved_id" end I''d like to make use of this again with my Bar and BarVersion class without copying and pasting. Any thoughs on how I could do this? Thanks, Richard -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/....

...the time to convert my already somewhat large MP3 archive (unless I get that new CPU :). Kudos to all involved. I'm greatly anticipating new developments. -dj screaming in digital * http://www.xiph.org/archives/vorbis/0122.html -- http://dj.frogfarm.org/ ...for the best in unapproved information "There is an email in which somebody says exactly that." "Is that the one that said he was going to kill all the lawyers and judges?" "No, it is a different one." - MPAA v 2600, June 6 Protective Order Hearing --- >8 ---- List archives: http://ww...

...-CreatorSID: this data field is added to a machine record joined to an AD in certain situations. MS issued a client side patch in the name of ?security? that checks for this data: "KB5020276" The machine re-join goes pear shaped if it is found and if you have NOT applied an unapproved local machine registry mod? Which then means you have to delete the old record out of the LDAP OR change the name of the machine for the re-join, which is a real pain? If there was an option in the ?Samba-tool rename? that prevented copy over of this field into the new migration da...

Hello Everyone, I was wondering what people on this list were using to generate captchas within forms on sites they are developing? I know there is a ruby gem named captcha, but I have seen some others floating around as well. Thanks, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am running a Samba domain controller with LDAP integration. I have at least some workstations which do not seem to be syncing the time with the DC at all. My first instinct is to simply set the time with a logon script, but of course that runs as the user, whom does not have permission to set the system time. I would prefer to get it working right, to where the system syncs its time with the

...64 bit CPU to have 64 bit Linux on it, and I didn't want to make ugly workarounds like NDIS wrapper for piece of crap WiFi chip. Luckily, there is great WiFi: Intel (Atheros would be the second choice), I pulled out broadcom card, put in Intel one, I boot the machine, and BIOS tells me: remove unapproved hardware, and reboot the machine. Darn Compaq hardcoded into BIOS PCI IDs of "approved" cards you can put into they trash creature. I was mad as hell, especially as it is the same Compaq that used "clean room" approach to re-create IBM PC bootcode (phoenix BIOS it was called l...

Thank you very much for this hint. My apologies that I messed up a thread for my post - I had a message open and simply clicked on the link ... slap slap. Would anyone know of a better choice to multiplex three fxo lines into an asterisk box? I can still use three Digium X100P cards, but methinks, a seperate unit would be better. Thanks again, Peter >> I am located in the UK and

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri > Galtsev > Sent: den 2 november 2017 15:21 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > > On Thu, November 2, 2017 8:29 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm looking into

Folks, There has been enough discussion about keeping development downstream and how painful that is. Even more so, I think we all agree, is having downstream releases while tracking upstream releases, trunk and other branches (ex. Android). I have proposed "en passant" a few times already, but now I'm going to do it to a wider audience: Shall we sync our upstream release with the