search for: unansw

? Hi, From asterisk 1.8, the CDR table is not logging the unanswered or extn busy calls which hit while in the queue. I am talking about this setting in the cdr.conf : ; In brief, this option controls the reporting of unanswered calls which only have an A ; party. Calls which get offered to an outgoing line, but are unanswered, are still ; logged, and that is...

Hello,I was using the ResetCDR() right after my IVR answered the calls to set them unanswered until or if somebody pick up the callI just upgraded to version 1.4.19.1 and now ... when the ResetCDR() function is called it seems to just erase the recordIs there another to set the status of the call unanswered ? is it a bug ?Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachmen...

Dear friends, ? I am not able to capture the CDR records for unanswered calls. Only one record per call is coming in the CDR table. In the cdr.conf, I have enabled it by setting : unanswered = yes ?

Hi, Does anybody know if there is a way for a call goes back to transferer if unanswered ? Thanks Luis A P Barbosa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070912/1e356013/attachment.htm

If the end user does not pick up the phone, is there a way to log to the CDR about the call file failing? /var/log/asterisk/messages does show a NOTICE message [2015-12-31 06:58:46] NOTICE[28059] pbx_spool.c: Call failed to go through, reason (3) Remote end Ringing [2015-12-31 06:58:46] NOTICE[28059] pbx_spool.c: Queued call to SIP/102 expired without completion after 0 attempts but I would

...t together with Digiums mailing lists, voip-info.org wiki and rest of asterisk user contributed links we will bring valuable information source for Asterisk users/community. However we still need your help and involvement, Asterisk online forums are looking for your expertise, please help with unanswered questions and share your asterisk experience with the rest of online community. Any of you that have ever been to the Gentoo forums knows the drill. Adopt an unanswered post and answer it today. All of you that come here in look through posts, go ahead and answer some! If you don't kno...

Hello, This is regarding recent/ongoing discussions about F18 being merged in LLVM. I was going through these threads, and I found few important points which were possibly left unanswered (or I might have missed few threads). URL: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-December/000120.html Point: Is (3) AST -> FIR -> MLIR LLVM-IR -> LLVM-IR) in a shape where we can generate LLVM IR now? [*1] F18 generates parser tree after successful completion of parsing...

...code do this? I have busydetect turned off. - Incoming calls could be picked up immediately, then receive ringback or hold music while Asterisk rings the handsets. Asterisk could then detect caller hangup with the usual kewlstart signalling. The problem is that the caller always gets billed for unanswered calls. (Although this might have the advantage of encouraging people to leave a message once they realize they're going to get billed for the call either way.) - I could add an extra prompt after the outbound message saying "Please press 1 if you would like to leave a message.&quot...

...e Xen server, so paravirtualization posed few risks. And I had control of the DHCP setup. so I could trivially set up a tftp server to do a non-CD installation, because Xen, at last look, doesn't support installing a paravirtualized host from a CD image. So I'm right back to my effectively unanswered original questions. So please: I asked a very specific pair of questions, and they remain unanswered. CentOS 5 Xen server (hypervisor, or Dom0, whatever we want to call it this week): Does CentOS 6 work, paravirtualized, on such a server? And given my deployment issues, does anyone have a base...

I havent been able to find a solution to my original post: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/63110 I will really appreciate some insight/advice Thank you. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am wanting to use the ISDN cause code on an Asterisk 1.6 server to determine the status of a call attempt, where the call might not actually connect. Reason is I am checking for valid telephone numbers from a list of numbers, and I would like to know if the call has answered and cleared which I can by writing the hangupcause variable, but where I get an out of order network message, or number

Hello, Since some months I can not get any feedback from you for my questions in two different account with the same name. I just wonder is there any specific reason for it? Maybe my english is not so clear or I ask wrong questions for wrong lists I don't know but in any case I think I should have been informed. Sincerely Yours Murat Can Tuna

Hi list, I'm wondering if it's possible to transfer a call that is still ringing??? I Have some Grandstream GXP-2000 and with the TRNF button it's impossible. So, I've configured some keys to transfer the calls like this: [featuremap] blindxfer => #2 ; Blind transfer (default is #) disconnect => *0 ; Disconnect (default is *) ;automon => *1

So I hacked up the Dial app to return a numeric return code instead of changing contexts based on a number being busy or unanswered. The purpose for this modified dial app, which I call AGIDial, is to help me concoct a "follow-me" type of application. The app returns -1 for a completed call, 0 for unanswered, or 1 for busy. Well, I hooked the thing up to an AGI script that uses perl and AGI.pm, and ran some test...

Apologies if this messages appears more than once, somehow sending it via gmane's nntp-server doesn't work as expected. Been trying to send this message for 2 days now, without success so far... --- Hello, I'm exploring the capablities of Asterisk and must say I'm really impressed! However, I don't need most of the options, but can't figure out the things that appear

Hi list, I'm wondering if it's possible to transfer a call that is still ringing??? Actually, the problem is that my telco provider doesn't offer an uniform method for answer/disconnection supervision, and by that I mean, some of it's line (I think) offer a polarity reversal, but other lines (of the same service provider) do not offer anything at all, so the answer of a call

How long does one have to typically wait for an answer to a post? Tomorrow my message will have been up a week, and I've gotten no replies. It was about whether a file, while it was being written to, could subsequently be opened by another client for reading. I used a DVR with chasing play as an example. Didn't seem like that difficult of a question, but maybe it isn't geeky

...ion :subject "Automatic response to: ${1}" "thanks for your message"; keep; } But now I would like to distinct messages that where answered from those where the vacation module did not send back a message. Is it possible to store answered messages in one folder and unanswered in an other? # probably invalid sieve syntax if vacation .... { fileinto "answered/"; stop; else fileinto "unanswered/"; stop; } After reading RFC 5230 I feel it's not possible at all :-/ Andreas

...ions/experiences are that relate. This is an Asterisk system, of course. ------- I looked at the server logs for the phone call missed by XXXX. They indicate that the call came in at 15:32:25, and was routed to her telephone at 15:32:32. This timed out after about 25 seconds as it should if unanswered, and was sent to voicemail at 15:32:58. I called BBBBBB and asked her to check the phone display. She told me that the phone logged an unanswered call at 15:32:32, precisely in accordance with the server log. This leaves two possible conjectures: * The telephone, for whatever reason,...

...-- they may have an initial author who cares about the content of an article. If so, that author will set a monitor on that article on a self-service basis, and read diffs, and decide if they still care. We settled that long ago You know, my initial reaction is to revert this as it is still unanswered I am aware of no 'style guide' to the effect of that commit comment, and would not support one to that effect if proposed. It breaks agile development. If you want bureaucracy, Fedora awaits I've made my view in CentOS space (that is: here) quite clear, that broken matter nee...