Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "unaligned_uint32_t".
Did you mean:
unaligned_int32_t
2016 Jan 18
3
[cfe-dev] RFC: Enforcing pointer type alignment in Clang
Hi John,
On 15 Jan 2016, at 08:14, John McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> The question at hand is whether we should require the user to write this:
> misaligned_A_B *p = &a.b;
> instead of, say:
> A::B *p = &a.b;
> int x = *(misaligned_int*) &p->n;
> because we want to reserve the right to invoke undefined behavior and