search for: unacceptibly

Hello, we have the following problem with a ADDC Sernet 4.7.6-11 on CentOS 7.4. We have two DCs, replication is working fine. We use bind9 as dns-backend. When we do a "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" we get the following messages: ------------------- [root at dc1 ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable

On Wed, 2 May 2018 13:54:01 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > we have the following problem with a ADDC Sernet 4.7.6-11 on CentOS > 7.4. We have two DCs, replication is working fine. We use bind9 as > dns-backend. When we do a "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" we get the > following messages: > ------------------- > [root at

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

Ok, with the smb.conf change and then samba_dnsupdate --rpc-server-ip=192.168.177.19 --use-samba-tool --verbose I got no error messages. Shall I now revert the change? Monitor? At present samba_dnsupdate has nothing to do.. Thanks, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Rowland penny via samba Gesendet: Monday, 12 August

As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. I have internet searched for solutions. I have done everything on /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ and I am still getting: At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names": dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 Failed update of 29

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

Hi, One of my APC devices reports: "unacceptable utility voltage rate of change". I believe it has something to do with input voltage fluctuating too fast maybe even beneath or over the input voltage thresholds. Should I worry about this? should I measure input voltage? (I suppose I'd need more than multimeter readings. Maybe an oscilloscope or a multimeter that can record

is the time in sync on your servers ? >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Roel van Meer >Verzonden: donderdag 6 augustus 2015 9:28 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] 2nd DC, internal DNS: >dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable > >L.P.H. van Belle writes: > >> check the rights

I found another reason for this error: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable After much head scratching it was due to the Apparmour configuration recommended in the WiKi at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_AppArmor_and_SELinux_Integration The section for Apparmor which recommends adding lines to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named, I had to change the line: from:

On 03/07/2020 14:39, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote: > As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. > > I have internet searched for solutions. > > I have done everything on > /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ > and I am still getting: > > At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose

check the rights on : /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Roel van Meer >Verzonden: donderdag 6 augustus 2015 8:55 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] 2nd

Hi, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.1.20'] force update: A samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: NS empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: NS _msdcs.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: A empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: SRV _ldap._tcp.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 389 force update: SRV

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > check the rights on : > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind I'm using the internal DNS on both DC's, so I guess bind access rights aren't the issue. Thanks for your answer though :) Regards, Roel > >-----Oorspronkelijk

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

On 06/08/15 09:08, Roel van Meer wrote: > L.P.H. van Belle writes: > >> is the time in sync on your servers ? > > Yes it is. > > I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver > in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, > samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use > the local Samba as resolver,

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > is the time in sync on your servers ? Yes it is. I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use the local Samba as resolver, it no longer works. So it is a DNS issue (possibly related to replication

On 2015-08-06 18:55, Roel van Meer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with > DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. > > I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, > samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error > > "TSIG error with

On 30/12/15 18:19, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Hello! > I've got this error > dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable > > when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose > > With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines > that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. > > Already tried the step described here > >