search for: umsl

Hi folks, I've been testing out Windows Vista Enterprise today. It defaults to only using NTLMV2 authentication. I'm testing with Samba 3.0.23d running on Sparc/Solaris 8. Samba is configured with security = domain The password server is a Windows Server 2003 domain controller. I've joined Samba to the domain. I simply can't get Vista to connect unless I change its security

....cgi?id=643), but seems to act similarly. System is a SunFire V100 (Ultra IIe) running Solaris 9. orwell$ uname -a SunOS orwell 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2 Solaris Thanks, Tom -- Thomas A. Kyle, GCFW Network Security Analyst University of Missouri-St. Louis tkyle at jinx.umsl.edu (314) 516-6012

I'm working on trying to get Samba 3.0.23c to work with Vista and I've run into a snag. If a share is set up for security = share, and protected with a password, when I try to mount the share using Start->Run->\\server\share, the password is rejected by Samba for about the first 10 seconds, but after that, it lets me in. I've tried all the common suggestions such as changing

I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is allowed: -r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it

...oup:cfusion:rwx #effective:rwx mask:rwx other:--- root@huckfinn:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# id schaefer uid=241(schaefer) gid=60003(cfusion) root@huckfinn:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# cat /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from TOMCAT.umsl.edu (134.124.15.21) # Date: 2001/08/31 11:24:37 # Global parameters [global] hosts allow = 134.124. 128.206. workgroup = UMSL netbios name = HUCKFINN interfaces = 134.124.15.26 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes security = SHARE encrypt pas...

We've recently migrated my entire University including faculty and staff from Novell to Samba. There's typically 700+ clients connected to the samba server at any given time and thus far there are about 400GB of client's files on the server. Basically every Microsoft Windows user generated file (Word, Excel, whatever) of the entire University gets stored on my Samba server. Obviously

Good morning, I have a working Offline Files setup w/Samba 3.0.24 (FreeBSD 6.2 host OS) and a Win XP SP2 client. Upon updating to Samba 3.0.25, the XP client's offline cache would show (as viewed via the Offline Files Folder) that synced files are write-only ('User W' in the Access column). When offline, theses files appeared to be available via Explorer and double clicking would

...Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: majzoube at umsl.edu QA Contact: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Created attachment 133577 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=133577&action=edit output of journalctl -b -1 booting into 4.12.5-300 I don't know exactly where to post this bug. Initially I posted on RedHat bugzil...

Samba is a domain member server authenticating to a MS-Windows domain controller. With 3.0.7 and all previous version for the past few years I could map a Windows to Unix userid in the username map file like so.. fred = fredw His home directory was then accessible as \\servername\fredw so \\servername\%username% from a Windows NTx client. I make EXTENSIVE use of that functionality. I missed

I truely believe I've stumbled across a bug deleting directories. The bug is either with Windows 2000 or with Samba 2.2.1a and 2.2.2. I'd tend to think it was a Windows bug except that the problem does not occur against earlier versions of Samba. I've duplicated this problem deleting directories to Samba versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.1a in various configurations running on several

Hi everyone, I rely on about 8 NetBIOS aliases on my samba filer. I have been using security = server, but I have been running to some strange issues where if a user just logs off and then back on, they are denied access to shares. If they reboot, they can then get back in ok. I've set debugging up, and it appears that samba does not recognize the user after a logoff/logon, and uses nobody as

...; non-Domain workgroup? (lcea mdx) > 28. Annoying Printer problem...Samba 2.2.7a on > Debian 3.0 with lprng (Gareth Davies) > 29. Profiles and Win2000 (Fridtjof Busse) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:14:08 -0600 > From: Tom Schaefer <tom@umsl.edu> > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: [Samba] max log size setting ignored > > I work at a university and we are in the process of > moving basically everything, and I mean everything > to samba, eg.: > > bash-2.03$ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus | wc -l >...

More precisely what I've discovered is, at least in the cases of 2.2.8a and 3.0alpha22, when a 64-bit Samba is built with Sun's Forte compiler you'll end up with something incompatible with Mac OS 10.2.3. I always compile Samba myself with Sun's compiler to produce a 64-bit Samba. Well yesterday it came to my attention that Mac OS 10.2.x doesn't work with whats on my main

When ONE PARTICULAR user connects to \\mydev\oubsgout <\\mydev\oubsgout> the user (running win95) connects( from windows explorer) but only sees top level directories in the share. Any ideas as to why only one user should be affected?The network between the client PC and the server checks out ok. When the user attempts to expand one of these top level directories a messagebox appears stating

ugh :) Today I became infected with the bliss virus, any info on this would be appreciated! How do I scan for files infected and is it possible to remove it? I first noticed the infection when running a program (not as root) messages flashed on the screen about transversing directories and such. The program (gimp) had been working fine since I downloaded the binary for gimp from their main

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100228 Bug ID: 100228 Summary: [NV137] unknown chipset (137000a1) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau

I use a lot of "force user" and "force group" directives on various shares. With smbstatus of Samba 2 I could always verify with a glance what uid and gid a particular service is being accessed as, with Samba 3 you can't. I'd REALLY like to see that come back to smbstatus. Here's a real world example of my complaint... Samba 2 smbstatus output... Samba version

Is anybody experiencing what I have twice now -- Samba 3.x running fine on Sparc/Solaris 8 for a week or more then one day out of the blue it'll just go all haywire? So haywire that in both my instances of this I had to change Samba versions to get the servers back to life. Long boring story short on any useful detail below... Recently I had to go from 2.x to 3.x series since there

I updated all my servers to 3.0.25 early this morning. Everything seems 100% A-OK except for the most surprising thing, all my Windows and Macintosh clients, no problems. But I'm having severe difficulty with the 3.0.25 smbclient. If I use smbclient from 3.0.24 it too can connect to my 3.0.25 servers without issue. Its bizarre. Before I go into it let me say, I've got some 3.0.25

Hi, I've spent a lot of time digging the last couple days and seen some talk about how now with 3.7.1p1 the PAM challenge response requiring keyboard interactive on the client is "right" and no longer a kludge. I understand that. Unfortunately I've got a bunch of users who's client (www.ssh.com's client version 3.2.3) doesn't function without a kludged server.