Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "uml_vector_sendmmsg".
2019 May 22
0
custom virt-io support (in user-mode-linux)
...y possible,
>
> I went for the native approach at the end though.
Hmm. I'm not sure what you mean by either :-)
Is there any commonality between the vector drivers? I can't see how
that'd work without a bus abstraction (like virtio) in qemu? I mean, the
kernel driver just calls uml_vector_sendmmsg(), which I'd say belongs
more to the 'outside world', but that can't really be done in qemu?
Ok, I guess then I see what you mean by 'native' though.
Similarly, of course, I can implement arbitrary virt-io devices - just
the kernel side doesn't call a function like uml...
2019 May 22
1
custom virt-io support (in user-mode-linux)
On 22/05/2019 14:02, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While my main interest is mostly in UML right now [1] I've CC'ed the
> qemu and virtualization lists because something similar might actually
> apply to other types of virtualization.
>
> I'm thinking about adding virt-io support to UML, but the tricky part is
> that while I want to use the virt-io basics
2019 May 22
4
custom virt-io support (in user-mode-linux)
Hi,
While my main interest is mostly in UML right now [1] I've CC'ed the
qemu and virtualization lists because something similar might actually
apply to other types of virtualization.
I'm thinking about adding virt-io support to UML, but the tricky part is
that while I want to use the virt-io basics (because it's a nice
interface from the 'inside'), I don't actually
2019 May 22
4
custom virt-io support (in user-mode-linux)
Hi,
While my main interest is mostly in UML right now [1] I've CC'ed the
qemu and virtualization lists because something similar might actually
apply to other types of virtualization.
I'm thinking about adding virt-io support to UML, but the tricky part is
that while I want to use the virt-io basics (because it's a nice
interface from the 'inside'), I don't actually