Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "uml1".
Did you mean:
uml
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] device eth0 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge Net6
...and then to Net6 the followin=
g error occurs: "device eth0 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave=
it to bridge Net6" =
Is this a bug or a feature? Why is it not allowed to bind an Interface to t=
wo different bridges? =
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Problem: =
UML1 ---- bridge1 \
eth0 =
UML2 ---- bridge2 /
Workaround?:
UML1 ---- bridge1 \
bridge3 ---- eth0
UML2 ---- bridge2 /
UML1 \
bridge1 ---- eth0
UML2 /
Thanks for your help
Tim Keupen
-------------- next part ---------...
2005 Apr 01
0
Gateway with 9 VMs
Yes, List, I am an UML user that already have a real machine
running 8 UML for:
UML1..UML4 are used for connection to one leased line
that is used for incoming/outgoing mail and incoming
webmail accesses:
UML1=internal firewall, connected to internal LAN
UML2=mailrelay/dmz
UML4=webrelay/dmz
UML3=external firewall, connected to the NET
UML5 and UML6 are used for connection to o...
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] bridge doesn't broadcast properly
...de
Linux) connected with the virtual bridge.
Communications works quite well between the host and the virtual machines.
Setup:
2 UMLs connected via tap-devices to the bridge (tap1,tap2).
The host uses the bridge-device br0 to talk to the clients.
Now I want to tcpdump the traffic between host and UML1 on virtual machine UML2.
With the standard-settings UML2 only catches the initial
ARP-broadcasts (but that's the intended behaviour of the
bridge/switch). :-)
Now I set "brctl setageingtime br0 0", so that the bridge behaves like
a hub (it forgets the MAC-addresses immediately) and...
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Ip traffic not bridged
...:~ #
I am using Suse 9.0 :
linux:~ # uname -a
Linux linux 2.6.5-7.97-smp #1 SMP Fri Jul 2 14:21:59 UTC 2004 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Also I have cleared all the rules in iptables. Any other
ideas/pointers will be a great help.
Shavian.
ps: the ifconfig output: tap1 and tap2 are connected to UML1 and UML2
(fe:fd:c0:a8:00:03 and fe:fd:c0:a8:00:04 respectively )
linux:~ # ifconfig -a
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:FF:7D:86:06:47
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUN...
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Strange DHCP behaviour with bridging
Here is the scenario: I have one server with kernel 2.4.24 with a bridge br0
made of 2 interfaces, eth0 and tap0 (the last is an OpenVPN tunnel), and one
remote computer connetting through tap0. If I assign a static IP to the
remote computer, the bridge works perfecly (so I think the problem is not
OpenVPN-related). If I start a DHCPd on the server and I configure the remote
client to get the