Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "umf".
Did you mean:
um
2012 Aug 14
1
Error; contrasts can be applied only to factors with 2 or more levels
...97,
+ 90,
+ 82,
+ 86,
+ 90,
+ 94,
+ 84,
+ 68,
+ 62,
+ 44,
+ 64,
+ 73,
+ 92,
+ 106,
+ 119,
+ 125,
+ 126,
+ 132,
+ 138,
+ 157,
+ 160,
+ 171,
+ 174,
+ 164,
+ 159,
+ 149,
+ 132,
+ 109,
+ 80,
+ 62,
+ 49,
+ 42,
+ 36,
+ 30,
+ 26,
+ 44,
+ 51,
+ 67,
+ 70,
+ 88), nrow=R, ncol=J, byrow=TRUE))
>
>
> umf<-unmarkedFrameOccu(y=y, siteCovs=ndvi, obsCovs=elev)
> summary(umf)
unmarkedFrame Object
121 sites
Maximum number of observations per site: 2
Mean number of observations per site: 2
Sites with at least one detection: 13
Tabulation of y observations:
0 1 <NA>
223 19 0...
2007 Aug 22
3
SID
...also add the other necesary stuff....
and after the changes when i try to map the shares on the Samba
3.0.24-6etch4 from windows vista i have this error:
User mf with invalid SID S-1-5-21-3688588122-661306053-2264363457-21150
in passdb
However in the linux box i try: smbclient -L //localhost -Umf it`s
connect and can see the shares...
but:
smbclient -L //localhost/dat -Umf i write the passwd and get the same
error.
so, tried to put the SID of the server samba with the ldap tree... with:
net setdomainsid S-1-5-21-3688588122-661306053-2264363457
net setdomainsid -W domain S-1-5-21-36885...
2008 Aug 09
2
xy plot in version 2.7.1 for Mac (PR#12520)
...nYk124d0Tiy143U1VhRtusm
+Yx3W4+D2n2pYAgz2Z5qrakxHm+WU+c3y3acAofJjGtisnKJVVSEw1MmM2zgg5ShnBkqrzTll1em
xpRLBzIr0/IzK334hZes9flo7RIfWxJOH581tWxGuVrY1PSs7Bnl6VOZ3qDXe/K3ZFQX18zKTvPq
kkdXv/S2L9/le3dwdFV9weRNC6eNrnjWOqHAcatlnDjh6u71Wzdt4Ld++sv9DeH5al4he80n3+lo
kpZaaj40OtRrNNHxYx0dYxSZp2U5UZLmrxpQz1A7ehM1Wumf+0enWqvGLKpV/XE9VCLhxoh7O+7k
8b7UPcNx69QBW/EGuBBvcSm4ZwuQVQ9boh097m4UCAZamub76m/vbl81u1XzgJMyXr2vf8FPbWEx
UV+rpT5fyKbLAAUgkAu4FDAHsBSwE7AXoCdLQrMGdAvgKOAKQE9+Ibv/kan+GMgDGhlYuapME9vj
4uIlmjjwlXCczp4bp4Eb4m5Vcbcp0+LqSQ1xOr44Tm2FZRE0PmBKKRuuzxKy6HUApx5gxo+ThTG8
DT8lZJIM4AKGqmn8gm2gwFu296ggEhO4wHB7dSnD...
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking