search for: umanitoba

The `lofiadm'' man page describes how to export a file as a block device and then use `mkfs -F pcfs'' to create a FAT filesystem on it. Can''t I do the same thing by first creating a zvol and then creating a FAT filesystem on it? Nothing I''ve tried seems to work. Isn''t the zvol just another block device? -- -Gary Mills- -Unix Group-

Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage management would take place on the file server, where the physical disks reside. The application server would still perform end-to-end error checking but would notify the file server when it detected

So I have a bunch of users who are roaming - IE no static IP address from all over the internet. Some of them are able to use SMTP-AUTH which is great, but for those that can't, a pop before smtp solution is in place using relay-ctrl-age & cdb files via qmail. Would it be desirable to have this feature in dovecot? I'd really like to ditch qmail-pop3d, etc. vpopmail has a

...**************** Blog: http://iamarf.wordpress.com/ Wiki: http://infomedfi.pbwiki.com/ Blog Clown in corsia: http://m-illumino-d-immenso.blogspot.com/ Distribuzione dispense MedWiki: http://www.medwiki.it/ Studente del corso "Connectivism and Connective Knowledge Online Course" http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wiki/Connectivism ************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mechanize-users/attachments/20090409/6d1fe794/attachment.html>

Hi, I am trying to get TextWrangler to work with LaTeX and Sweave. Ideally I would call a script from TextWrangler that would run Sweave on a document, then LaTeX (using SyncTeX), and finally open the corresponding pdf in Skim. Of course I don't always need to run Sweave and would be looking for the option of LaTeX -> Open. I found this http://www.xs4all.nl/~msneep/latex/ but it

We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that''s derived from LUNs on a Netapp filer. There''s a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with messages appearing and being deleted frequently. I know that ZFS uses copy-on- write, so that blocks in use are never overwritten, and that deleted blocks are added to a free list. This behavior would spread the free list all over the zpool. As well,

After an upgrade of a busy server to Oracle Solaris 10 9/10, I notice a process called zpool-poolname that has 99 threads. This seems to be a limit, as it never goes above that. It is lower on workstations. The `zpool'' man page says only: Processes Each imported pool has an associated process, named zpool- poolname. The threads in this process are the pool''s

The following seems to be a bug when I tried to use the predict function. > forbes boil.pt pressure log.pressure [1,] 194.5 20.79 303.4472 [2,] 194.3 20.79 303.4472 [3,] 197.9 22.40 310.9061 [4,] 198.4 22.67 312.1042 [5,] 199.4 23.15 314.1995 [6,] 199.9 23.35 315.0597 [7,] 200.9 23.89 317.3460 [8,] 201.1 23.99

...to hear back from you as to the current status of this feature request (which I really hope gets included), and would appreciate any feedback you've got on my suggestions or on any work you've done on this code since February 2000. Cheers! -- Gilbert E. Detillieux E-mail: <gedetil@cs.umanitoba.ca> Dept. of Computer Science Web: http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~gedetil/ University of Manitoba Phone: (204)474-8161 Winnipeg, MB, CANADA R3T 2N2 Fax: (204)474-7609 "Cautionary tales don't end with 'It was SO COOL!'" - Malcolm in the Middle

...th= rsh-command=/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap # For large Mailboxes tcp-read-warning-timeout=180 For details have a look at: http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/ssh/ch11_03.htm http://www.cs.unc.edu/cgi-bin/howto?howto=pine-imap http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/ http://www.umanitoba.ca/acn/docs/pine/pine-imap.html Migration from UW Imapd to dovecot: =================================== Disable UW Imapd in xinetd http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration Migrate Mailboxes: http://wiki.dovecot.org/uw2dovecot.sh or cd $USER cp .mailboxlist .subscriptions dovecot configuration: Config...

I am using R 2.14.1. I am trying to configure Lyx with Sweave. I have read articles but I found none to be complete and I cannot import sweave document in lyx . Can anyone please help me with a stepwise procedure how to configure Lyx with Sweave so that I can run my R-code chunks from LYX ,the output being a pdf.? Thanks in advance. -Atanu -- View this message in context:

Hello everyone. I am in the process of writing a book in Latex with Texshop, on Mac. This book contains a lot of R code, hence the need to use Sweave. I was able to compile Rnw files, and to sync back and forth from the pdf to the source Rnw. My problem now is that the book is divided in Chapters, and every chapter is in its own Rnw file. I can compile them from the main one (book.Rnw) using the

...From: Sandra Johnson <sandra_johnk at yahoo.com> Subject: [LLVMdev] (no subject) To: copyrights at athenaeservices.com, inderscienceproofs at athenaeservices.com, manuscripts at causalproductions.com, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu, tulsi at cs.umanitoba.ca Message-ID: <1321802106.72557.yint-ygo-j2me at web35703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 http://bawb.info/pdf/pozlvmd.htm ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:13:15 +0000 From: Stephen McGruer <stephen.mcgruer at gm...

...mment = Common file space path = /usr/common browsable = yes writable = yes public = yes John Hill Logical Systems, Inc. 258 Main Street P.O. Box 649 Yarmouth, ME 04096 Phone: (207) 846-3669 Fax: (207) 846-3804 E-Mail: jhill@sawmillmanager.com Return-Path: <fastedy@spencer.cc.umanitoba.ca> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from spencer.cc.umanitoba.ca (spencer.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.168]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482A9485A for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from fastedy@localhost) by spence...

We have an IMAP server that uses ZFS filesystems for all of its mailbox and database files. As the number of users increases, with a consequent increase in the number of processes, the ARC size decreases from 10 gigabytes down to 2 gigabytes. I know that it''s supposed to do that, but in this case ZFS is starved for memory and the whole thing slows to a crawl. Is there a way to set a

I have a system that was recently upgraded to Solaris 10 10/09. It has a UFS root on local disk and a separate zpool on Iscsi disk. After a reboot, the ZFS filesystems were not mounted, although the zpool had been imported. `zfs mount'' showed nothing. `zfs mount -a'' mounted them nicely. The `canmount'' property is `on''. Why would they not be mounted at boot?

Hi there, Over the last week I wanted to move from using Borland windows compiler to g++ with libwine. I used winemaker to make the makefile. Fixed some problems with compiling (2 or so). But now I acn't start the program... The output file is the amdprime.so and a amdprime symlink to the wine script. But if I try to run the symlink I get: ./AmdPrime: line 400: 29548 Segmentation fault

hi All, I just compiled 2.0.5a and I was using 1.9.17p4. After upgrade, the smbclient test failed. I tried to copy the same conf file but it still failed. Added interface ip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx bcast=xxx.xxx.xxx.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 session request to NEYMAN01 failed session request to *SMBSERVER failed # ./testparm Load smb config files from /opt/samba2/lib/smb.conf Processing section

Hello again! Thanks to Dr. Brian Ripley, the make problem I reported earlier has been solved, and R-0.64.1 is now successfully installed and tested. There were two essential problems with the stock configuration: (i) the Fortran option -fPIC was not being propagated to certain Makefiles further down the tree; (ii) gmake was not being recognized when the library files were being

We have a zpool made of 4 512g iscsi luns located on a network appliance. We are seeing poor read performance from the zfs pool. The release of solaris we are using is: Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC The server itself is a T2000 I was wondering how we can tell if the zfs_vdev_max_pending setting is impeding read performance of the zfs pool? (The pool consists of lots of small files).