search for: ultra1s

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

I decided to use S99samba in /etc/rc2.d, during the boot up i see the message "samba started" or something like that but when i log in and do "ps -ef|grep mbd" i do not see neither smbd nor nmbd running. PC side gives me the error "computer not found" message. I move the S99samba to /etc/rc3.d and see no messages during the boot up. "ps ..." output is same

Hi All I'm trying to get my Ultra UPS connected. It connects using a standard USB cable I have --with-drivers=hidups in the configure command and I have lsusb showing Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0d9f:0001 Powercom Co., Ltd Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 I have /dev/usb/hiddev0 now matter what I try I keep getting upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.0.3 Can't

Hey everybody! I have a small problem with my samba setup, running on a sparc ultra1 serving NT4/sp3 clients. I am using the most recent release and everything is working perfectly in terms of authentication with my NT box set up as the password server. The only problem is as follows: It is important for us to preserve case, so for all of the services, I have "preserve case = yes".

Hello, I am having some difficulty in getting Samba v.1.9.18p10 to authenticate using server security. I have couple of users that do not have unix accounts and those are the users that can not connect to the samba server. The message that I get in the logfile is server rejected the session. I have no problem login in to the server, but I also have a account on the unix server. Server

Hello, I'm running Samba 2.0.6 on a Sun Ultra1 as a file and print server for a GIS teaching lab. Samba has solved a bunch of problems for us but one serious one remains. Getting a large directory listing from within two applications, ERMapper 5.5 and ArcView 3.1 running on win95, is a factor of 10 slower than getting the same listing from a local drive or a win95 machine serving SMB.

Hello, Our university has a study in progress looking at using SAMBA to provide file/print sharing as an enterprise-wide solution. Does anyone know of an entity that uses SAMBA to support up to or more than 10 site locations, over 125 buildings, and supporting over 5000 workstations? -- Regards, /~\ The ASCII Richard Jackson \ / Ribbon Campaign Computer Systems Engineer,

Hi folks, I'm trying to set up a small vpn between a few Sun Ultra1 machines (UltraSparc). Distribution is Debian Woody (stable). The problem: Sunclient: ~~~~~~~~~~ tinc-1.0pre7 original binary package from Woody, machine is running on original distribution kernel (2.4.18). # ls -l /dev/net/tun crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 200 Nov 6 22:09 /dev/net/tun # lsmod Module

Hi I look at list archives and at samba docs but I did not found ... please can some one help me? I have to write a unix program that need to check if it can write to a file and place the apropriate locks before write. Those files are in a Samba share. I intend to use fcntl() function to check and set the locks. I wrote a test program to see if the fcntl() function can see the samba locks

on solaris7/sparc this device doesn't exists i can use EGD but he very big (perl script!) - in memory it take about 4mb! apache use the same! why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? what alternatives exists?

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote: > Subject: /dev/urandom > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote: > > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? > > > > i think the

Hi, I have a retro LAN running things like Sun SPARCclassics, Ultra1s, Win98 and WinXP. I decided to standardize most of the Sun boxes on the latest versions of OpenBSD that support their architectures (5.9 for Sun4c & Sun4m, 7.4 for Sun4u). I have a Debian 7 server with RAIDs to store all the packages, configs, games, etc. I like to use Samba to transfer the fil...

I'm having a dynamic loading problem that seems to be caused by exponentiation (the ** operator in Fortran/ratfor). This can be illustrated by the following toy example: ===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== % cat foo.r subroutine foo(x,n) x = x**n return end % f77 -c foo.r /tmp/ratfor.06661.0.f: foo: % R CMD SHLIB -o foo.so foo.o gcc -G -o

Hi folks, after recompiling of kernel (need quota support), tinc daemon has stopped working. Messages from log file are: ... Nov 21 14:45:02 m61 tinc.sunnet[326]: tincd 1.0pre7 starting Nov 21 14:45:02 m61 tinc.sunnet[326]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux ethertap device Nov 21 14:45:02 m61 tinc.sunnet[326]: Process 327 (tinc-up) exited with non-zero status 255 Nov 21 14:45:02 m61 tinc.sunnet[326]:

I am having a problem with some Windows 95 PC's . I had Samba 2.0.5 installed on a Sun system with Solaris 6, and a local network of PC's with W95 and W98, and everything was working fine. I then installed a new server with Solaris 8, and changed the IP addresses on the network, and the W98 PC was fine as was one of the W95 PC's, but 2 W95Pc's cannot see the Samba share, if I do

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dragen@pbsi.org ?rta: | I am hacing trouble. I can see my linux box from my windows box, I can connect | and browse but I cant delete or modify files. Do I have something wrong? | | The is my smb.conf | | [global] | netbios name = dragenlinux | server string = "DragenLinux" | workgroup = WORKGROUP | security = share | log file =

To the server from the local disk 7 mins 38 seconds Copying from and two the samba server from nt/win2k clients is okay, I didn't get a chance to get figures for this :/ I saw a post similar to this suggesting that it was a NIC problem and that it was in full duplex mode? Im not sure I could check this on a dos client. any suggestions? We are using a 10mbit dumb hub. The server that is