search for: ulimited

Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! /etc/pam.d/common-session session required pam_limits.so /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max = 100000

I just realize that i can't run a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on my DC's (4.7.6): ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb' - Too many open files ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/ldb' - Too many open files ..... >From memory, it was just fine on samba 4.6 If I check system

Hi All, Hope you people are doing good. I have a manifest file : lass profile { # setup profile parms. We dont handle non Ubuntu OS yet if ("$operatingsystem" == "Ubuntu") { file { "/etc/profile.d": ensure => directory, purge => true, force => true, recurse =>

...ming up after a crash/reboot anyway, and any other reboots there will always be a human involved, but the way init is handling ulimit seems utterly retarded and broken. Some indication (different engineer found it, I haven't seen the RHEL case number) appears to indicate that folks wanted init ulimited heavily in case of startup DDoS type stuff, but we haven't figured out a semi-sane unix-conventional type way AROUND this when it's needed that if we were hit by the proverbial bus, a "normal" unix guy would find. Perhaps we're missing something. Thoughts? -- Nate Duehr...

> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not? Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the symbolizer, it goes away. > Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then > exec the specified binary > %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How

Hello, On a production system, I'm seeing this: [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14742] res_agi.c: Unable to create toast pipe: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] rtp.c: Unable to allocate RTCP socket: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732]

Hi I update os from debian8 to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master:

When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 < 4096), because of default_client_limit # doveconf default_internal_user default_internal_user = dovecot Should dovecot print this warning based on $default_internal_user, or based on root? As root: # ulimit -n 1024 As user dovecot: $ ulimit -n

> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the > process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that. We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS. The former is lighter weight and easy to configure. The downside is that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if, for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer. While

On 31 Jan 2015, at 01:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Hi testers, > > 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. > > The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please > file issues against it. > > Thanks for helping with the release! This time I got an error during check-all, on i386-unknown-freebsd10:

I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on Centos 5.4 64 bit. How do I do that? Been searching and have yet to find a good answer. Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to happen to late there. Matt

Hi, perhaps this? > with new debian9: > open files (-n) 1024 Regards Urban Am 16.09.20 um 12:57 schrieb Maciej Milaszewski: > Hi > Limits: > > Where all working fine: > > core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 > file size?????????????? (blocks,

Hi! Question from the novice. I have to permanently increase number of opened files ( ulimit -n 16384 and ulimit -Hn 16384) for some application. I did custom kernel based on https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-custom-kernel-modularized.html and application documentation ( written for RH 9), no error during all makes but I have panic during the

I am having a problem with running utorrent on wine. After running for a little while I eventually get: Error: Too many files open. I have set ulimit -n unlimited which gives me: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM :~# ulimit -n 1048576 root@???: 02:43 AM :~# Also its got plenty of file descriptors so it doesn't seem like wine is truly using up to that amount: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM

I get this when I reload dovecot after any changes. How can I fix it? I can?t find any reference to it anywhere. master: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_limit thanks Robert

...roubles with LFS with the mounted filesystems. Or maybe you run really play with the blkdev with file limits not set to unlimited? I think it's insane to set file limits for root during boot, the only problem I know of were because of the old userspace that doesn't handle correctly the new ulimited defines ~0UL instead of ~0UL>>1. We can provide total backwards compatibility with a simple IS_BLK check in generic_file_* in filemap.c, but I'm not sure if it really worth to add a branch there just for this. Andrea

Hi Limits: Where all working fine: core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 file size?????????????? (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals???????????????? (-i) 257970 max locked memory?????? (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size???????? (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files????????????????????? (-n) 65536 pipe

Hi Thomas, > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? > > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not > survive a reboot. > > Thanks for the response, I've been nosing around that file recently but noted the first two lines; #This file sets the

Dear for having an stable system which limit option is good for ulimit comand ? 2-is any option for making asterisk crash-free? Best -- Pezhman Lali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110810/365d9d56/attachment.htm>

Hi All, Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not survive a reboot. I've Googled plenty and can't find any solution, thanks Michael