Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "uless".
Did you mean:
unless
2014 Dec 16
2
rsync output under CentOS 6
Hello Kahlil,
Monday, December 15, 2014, 11:25:35 PM, you wrote:
KH> When you use --itemize-changes, does it indicate that the timestamps of the
KH> directories have changed?
Not uless the sequence of dots and letters before the folder name indicates that
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh at fullbore.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 192 byte...
2008 Apr 06
3
Need help with Cisco 7960
Hello all,
I need some help with my Cisco 7960 enabling TFTP. Does anyone know what numbers to press in the menu? Or can I enable this through telnet?
Many thanks,
Christian
2014 Dec 16
0
rsync output under CentOS 6
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Niamh Holding <niamh at fullbore.co.uk> wrote:
>
> KH> When you use --itemize-changes, does it indicate that the timestamps
> of the
> KH> directories have changed?
>
> Not uless the sequence of dots and letters before the folder name
> indicates that
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Niamh mailto:niamh at fullbore.co.uk
>
?Indeed: the sequence of dots and letters before the name indicates why
rsync wants to update a file.
>From the...
2014 Dec 15
6
rsync output under CentOS 6
Hello Elias,
Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote:
EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
their times should be in sync.
EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option.
Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though nothing is
transferred.
2004 Sep 05
4
Asterisk & sudo from httpd
Hello!
I want to use "asterisk -rx "show version"" from a php script called in
the browser using the local apache, which runs as user "apache".
Asterisk is running as root.
I added the following line to /etc/sudoers using visudo:
apache ALL = NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/asterisk
When i am on the command line of my linux box it looks like this:
2005 Dec 16
11
mysql mem-tables vs. memcached
Could someone please elaborate on the technical differences and practical
impact of whether choosing memory-based tables in MySQL or using memcached.
I got this far on my own:
It seems that MySQL uses the NDB engine for transaction-safe memory access
in a cluster. the memory storage engine seems to be faster but not
synchronizable by any means in a cluster. memcached seems to be ultimately
fast