search for: uled

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches for "uled".

Did you mean: ruled
2008 Nov 11
4
[LLVMdev] Invalid comparison instruction generation
Eli, Using the variables from the original IR, assuming tmp == tmp1 and assume the value is not nan ogt(tmp, tmp1) is !isnan(tmp) && !isnan(tmp1) && tmp > tmp1, or false ule(tmp, tmp1) is isnan(tmp) || isnan(tmp1) || tmp <= tmp1, or true So, this is invalid, or am I misunderstanding what ogt and ule stand for? Assuming this is valid, why convert comparison instructions
2008 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] Invalid comparison instruction generation
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Eli, > Using the variables from the original IR, > assuming tmp == tmp1 and assume the value is not nan > ogt(tmp, tmp1) is !isnan(tmp) && !isnan(tmp1) && tmp > tmp1, or false > ule(tmp, tmp1) is isnan(tmp) || isnan(tmp1) || tmp <= tmp1, or true Correct; in fact, ogt and
2012 May 24
3
[LLVMdev] make check-lit + grep escape characters
I just want to update test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll that already uses grep. It uses grep + count, probably due to shorter construction. -Stepan. Eric Christopher wrote: > > On May 24, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > >> Hi all. I found that if you want to use grep with escape characters in >> lit, you should pass it within the double slash (\\). Since
2012 May 24
2
[LLVMdev] make check-lit + grep escape characters
Hi all. I found that if you want to use grep with escape characters in lit, you should pass it within the double slash (\\). Since the first one is captured by python scripts and the second one by grep. E.g. if you want to capture "grep icmp ule" you should pass "grep icmp\\ ule" So I'm going to commit the test with strings like this. How stable this feature in lit?
2008 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] Invalid comparison instruction generation
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > With the above kernel run through llc with -march=x86 > -view-dag-combine1-dags I still see the ogt as the comparison operation, but > when I run it with llc -march=x86 -view-legalize-dags the ogt node has been > transformed into a ule. Okay... I can see that in the attached graph. > So, my
2008 Nov 10
2
[LLVMdev] Invalid comparison instruction generation
I have a simple program that generates correct intermediate representation. However, when working on my backend, and my lowering function gets called. The comparison operation is flipped via an invalid transformation. i.e. gt ==> le, lt ==> ge etc.. define void @test_fc_if_gt(double %x, double %y, double addrspace(11)* %result) { entry: %x.addr = alloca double ;
2007 Oct 17
4
RELENG_7 jerky mouse and skipping sound
I just updated to RELENG_7 from 6.2 and I'm running into some really annoying issues with jerky mouse movement and skipping sound. This seems to be similar to: Re: SCHED_4BSD in RELENG_7 disturbs workflow This happens both with 4BSD and ULE. I seems to happen when I'm compiling ports and a new cc/bzip2/sh process fires off (I'm just watching top), I'll get the skip/freezeup.
2011 Dec 01
3
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is >>
2009 Feb 22
2
The machdep.hyperthreading_allowed & ULE weirdness in 7.1
...ID to 2 ioapic0 <Version 2.0> irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 <Version 2.0> irqs 24-47 on motherboard machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 0 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 If I flip machdep.hyperthreading_allowed sysctl, I still can see processes scheduled to both logical CPUs, yet, if I check IRQ status in the systat -vm, the CPU1 is not getting any timer interrupts, while CPU0 gets twice the normal amount. I wonder if something is broken - I would expect no processes to be scheduled to the CPU1. machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1: top: http://...
2011 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:08 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >>> interesting).
2012 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] make check-lit + grep escape characters
On May 24, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > Hi all. I found that if you want to use grep with escape characters in > lit, you should pass it within the double slash (\\). Since the first > one is captured by python scripts and the second one by grep. > E.g. if you want to capture "grep icmp ule" you should pass > "grep icmp\\ ule" > > So
2012 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] make check-lit + grep escape characters
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy <stpworld at narod.ru>wrote: > I just want to update test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll that > already uses grep. > It uses grep + count, probably due to shorter construction. > If you are touching such a test, please convert it to FileCheck. Use of 'grep' in tests is an endless source of problems, and we are
2010 Jul 20
2
make fails with samba-3.5.4 Solaris 9
Hi, I am having a problem getting a Makefile after I run configure as follows: ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba-3.5.4 --with-ads --with-krb5=/opt/samba-3.5.4/include/ --with-shared-mod ules=idmap_rid --with-ldap=/opt/samba-3.5.4/include/ldap.h There is no Makefile generated. Configure runs successfully. The error I get is: # /usr/local/bin/make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile
2015 Mar 26
4
[LLVMdev] `llvm.$op.with.overflow`, InstCombine and ScalarEvolution
I've run into cases where, because not all of LLVM's optimizations understand the semantics of the `llvm.$op.with.overflow` intrinsics, canonicalizing compares to `llvm.$op.with.overflow` ends up preventing optimization. For instance, running the following snippet through `opt -indvars` optimizes `%to.optimize` to `true`, but running it through `opt -instcombine -indvars` does not. ```
2013 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] Enabling vectorization with LLVM 3.3 for a DSL emitting LLVM IR
On 07/04/2013 01:39 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote: > Hi, > > Our DSL can generate C or directly generate LLVM IR. With LLVM 3.3, we can vectorize the C produced code using clang with -O3, or clang with -O1 then opt -O3 -vectorize-loops. But the same program generating LLVM IR version cannot be vectorized with opt -O3 -vectorize-loops. So our guess is that our generated LLVM IR lacks some
2013 Jul 04
3
[LLVMdev] Enabling vectorization with LLVM 3.3 for a DSL emitting LLVM IR
Hi, Our DSL can generate C or directly generate LLVM IR. With LLVM 3.3, we can vectorize the C produced code using clang with -O3, or clang with -O1 then opt -O3 -vectorize-loops. But the same program generating LLVM IR version cannot be vectorized with opt -O3 -vectorize-loops. So our guess is that our generated LLVM IR lacks some informations that are needed by the vectorization passes to
2008 Jan 30
3
newfs locks entire machine for 20seconds
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> >> The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220 >> controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare. > > I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while > keeping all other parameters exactly the same. Ok tried with an updated 7 world / kernel as
2008 May 12
4
7.0 issues fixed? upgrade timing?
1. I have a realtek network card and am using a cable modem router. Does anyone know if fixes for problems with these (see below) have been backported from HEAD to RELENG_7? 2. Is this a good time to upgrade to RELENG_7? 3. I read a post last week that advised that 7.1 is a long way off. Appreciate any advice on use of ULE 3.0 and ZFS prior to 7.1 and a comment on what is holding up 7.1. Thanks
2011 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:08 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang
2006 Apr 01
1
6.1 responsiveness under heavy (cpu?) load + thread monitoring
Hello, I have a RELENG_6/AMD64 with an AMD64X2 cpu, 1GB of memory, 512MB swap. I remarked that when I run 2 simulation program [1], sometimes, one of them run one or several of its threads [2] very slowly, but sometimes, it doesn't occur. I remarked that is doesn't depend on SMP/UP, ULE/4BSD, i386/AMD64. It seems to occur also with the kernel stress test under the same conditions (all