Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "uk31429".
Did you mean:
31429
2016 Apr 19
0
problem on simulation code (the loop unable to function effectively)
...than 0.05. If the
difference in means is large enough, you are almost guaranteed this.
In the cases where this is not occurring (i.e. the first difference in
scale parameters) you can see the difference in outcomes between the
three significance tests.
Jim
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35 AM, <uk31429 at student.umt.edu.my> wrote:
> Hi, i am sorry but that part is not a part of the code.
> I am just listing my variable for simulation out at the beginning in order
> to provide easy understanding.
> i am doing a whole night to find out where have i done wrong.But i just
> keep re...
2016 Apr 19
0
problem on simulation code (the loop unable to function effectively)
...1,1.5,2,2.5,3)
produces an error which has nothing to do with the loops. This is a
very basic mistake, for:
scale_parameter<-c(1,1.5,2,2.5,3)
fixes it. I think if you learn a bit about basic R coding you will be
able to fix these problems yourself.
Jim
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:03 AM, <uk31429 at student.umt.edu.my> wrote:
> Greeting dr jim,
>
> I am student from Malaysia. I am doing R simulation study. For your
> information, I have been written a code relating to 2 gamma distribution
> with equal skewness.
> skewness=1.0
> shape parameter=16/9
> scale paramet...