search for: ugs

I represent a graph as an adjacency matrix of class "dgCMatrix" (from the Matrix package). > xx 5 x 5 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix" a b c d e a . 1 1 . . b 1 . 1 . . c 1 1 . 1 1 d . . 1 . 1 e . . 1 1 . To check if the matrix defines and undirected graph, I have made the following functions/methods: is.UG <- function (object) { UseMethod("is.UG") }

Hi, this is my first help request so please bear with me. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do not. Is there something I'm misunderstanding or potentially a bug in the code? Below are the

I believe there to be a bug in the cvm.test module of the nortest package authored by Juergen Gross. I do not know how to contact the author directly. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do

Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

A system whose network routing table looks like this (abbreviated): Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 needs to look like this: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use

Hi All I have two hosts. Host A and Host B Host A routing table ------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.29.110.0 172.29.109.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 172.29.109.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0

Hi, Does anyone know how to fit a GAM where one or more smooth terms are constrained to be monotonic, in the presence of "by" variables or other terms? I looked at the example in ?pcls but so far have not been able to adapt it to the case where there is more than one predictor. For example, require(mgcv) set.seed(0) n<-100 # Generate data from a monotonic truth.

Hello This is a problem I encountered repeatedly and I found no answer that made me really happy. I hope it is not too trivial. I would like to give the concentration of a substance in a plot title: 5 ug/ml substance the '5' would be a variable and the ug should be micrograms (with greek letter mu). It is the mu that causes the problems for me. I failed using various combinations of

Here we go again! :) Setup: Ubuntu 12.04.4, Samba 4.1.6 compiled from sources running as AD DC, activated winbind following the wikipage. All on the same server. smb.conf: [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = DC1 server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc,

Hi, We are using dovecot 1.1.11 on Solaris 10u6. Under load, we are experiencing the following errors: Jun 4 18:30:59 ug1s02-zone1 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] auth(default): ldap(0202934816 at ug.smilecoms.com,10.31.3.13): ldap_search() failed (filter (uid=0202934816 at ug.smilecoms.com)): Server is busy We are authenticating against sun directory server yet see no errors in the directory

I've a weird problem with Samba. I'm using Samba to share a filesystem between two linux systems because I believe I need byte range locking to prevent multiple processes on different computers from reading/writing the same ISAM records. I have a Debian wheezy file server running Samba; no domain controller, just a simple, single share. I have a debian wheezy KVM mounting a share via

OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on it :( ) The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My problem is teql can''t

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

I follow Alan Lenarcic's very helpful tutorial on building R package for Windows (XP), which could be found in www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/AlanRPackageTutorial.pdf<http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuff_for_blog/AlanRPackageTutorial.pdf>. The package involves a small dll compiled from some very simple C++ codes. The build process seemed to work smoothly, until i

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3167 Bug ID: 3167 Summary: Bugs found by static tests Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Report...

I have just setup a VPN connection three sites using IPCOP. Everything seems to be talking ok, apart from browsing the network neighborhood. There are no NT/Win2K/XP servers running on any of the sites, all sites are just running win98 pc's using tcp/ip. I have tried configuring all PC's to be on the same workgroup and setup sharing, but still each site can only see the pc's

Hello, is it possible to setup a model/table schema like this: Groupable --> Membership <-- Group ^ ^ | | User UserGroup I tried the following but failed: Groupable (table with ''type'' column) has_many :memberships, :as => :groupable has_many :groups, :through => :memberships

Hi, Consider the following code: require(XML) xmlFile = paste( "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"ISO-8859-1\"?>\n", "<mzXML xmlns=\"a\" xmlns:xsi=\"b\" xsi:schemaLocation=\"c\">\n", "<parentFile a=\"a\" b=\"b\" />\n",

Hello folks, I have this really strange routing problem that no amount of googling and experimenting has been able to solve. Then again, I''m new to Xen and "advanced" networking, so I could be missing something very basic. Summary: an unprivileged domU with PCI frontend for a NIC is used as a router; icmp gets routed, but tcp/ip only partially. I''m using a