search for: uglifi

Environment: rvm ruby 1.9.2-p180 rails 3.1.rc1 Conditions: gem "coffee-script" # in Gemfile at least one file with .js.coffee (even empty inside) in app/assets Result: WEBrick or Unicorn hangs. Only kill -9 <pid> helps. P.S. What additional info should I provide? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Nick Lewycky wrote: > I've been running LLVM with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG (extra checks) turned on to > see what would happen, and it's been a complete disaster. > > The major problem is the use of this API: > > new CallInst(V, &Args[0], Args.size()); > > repeated throughout LLVM. When Args is empty, Args[0] is invalid, even > if the next

Hi, I've been running LLVM with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG (extra checks) turned on to see what would happen, and it's been a complete disaster. The major problem is the use of this API: new CallInst(V, &Args[0], Args.size()); repeated throughout LLVM. When Args is empty, Args[0] is invalid, even if the next operation is taking the address. Trying to fix it illustrates the depth of the

...) from /home/natmanu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247/gems/execjs-2.0.2/lib/execjs.rb:5:in `<module:ExecJS>'' from /home/natmanu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247/gems/execjs-2.0.2/lib/execjs.rb:4:in `<top (required)>'' from /home/natmanu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247/gems/uglifier-2.1.1/lib/uglifier.rb:3:in `require'' from /home/natmanu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247/gems/uglifier-2.1.1/lib/uglifier.rb:3:in `<top (required)>'' from /home/natmanu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247@global/gems/bundler-1.3.5/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:72:in `require''...

...Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> OK but this relies on users knowing that register_virtio_device calls device_register. I think we want to add a comment to register_virtio_device. Also the cleanup is uglified. I really think the right thing would be to change device_register making it safe to kfree. People have the right to expect register on failure to have no effect. That just might be too hard to implement though. For now, my suggestion - add a variable. > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci...

...Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> OK but this relies on users knowing that register_virtio_device calls device_register. I think we want to add a comment to register_virtio_device. Also the cleanup is uglified. I really think the right thing would be to change device_register making it safe to kfree. People have the right to expect register on failure to have no effect. That just might be too hard to implement though. For now, my suggestion - add a variable. > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci...

...#39;'rails'', ''3.2.9'' group :assets do gem ''sass-rails'', ''~> 3.1'' gem ''bootstrap-sass'', ''~> 2.0.0'' gem ''coffee-rails'', ''~> 3.2.2'' gem ''uglifier'', ''>= 1.2.3'' end # gem ''mysql2'',''0.2.6'' gem ''mysql2'',''0.3.11'' gem ''acts-as-taggable-on'' #gem "will_paginate", :git => ''git://github.com/mislav/will_pagin...

Hi, I''d like to do precompilation with compression in development mode. I''ve set config.assets.js_compressor = :uglifier config.assets.css_compressor = :sass in development.rb. But compression only seems to work in production mode, is that right? Michael Kastner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and...

...gem 'zurb-foundation' gem 'authlogic', :git => 'git://github.com/odorcicd/authlogic.git', :branch => 'rails3' # Use sqlite3 as the database for Active Record gem 'sqlite3' # Use SCSS for stylesheets gem 'sass-rails', '~> 4.0.3' # Use Uglifier as compressor for JavaScript assets gem 'uglifier', '>= 1.3.0' # Use CoffeeScript for .js.coffee assets and views gem 'coffee-rails', '~> 4.0.0' # See https://github.com/sstephenson/execjs#readme for more supported runtimes # gem 'therubyracer', plat...

> > I'd like to get the extra checks working so that they can help find our > > more subtle bugs. Any idea what we should do here? > > I don't really have a good idea, but I also don't want to significantly > uglify the sourcebase... #define V_CALLINST(V, Args) new CallInst(V, Args.size() == 0 ? NULL : &Args[0], Args.size()) :p -Keith

...''pg'' gem ''json'' gem ''execjs'' gem ''therubyracer'' group :assets do gem ''sass-rails'', ''~> 3.1.4'' gem ''coffee-rails'', ''~> 3.1.1'' gem ''uglifier'', ''>= 1.0.3'' end gem ''jquery-rails'' gem ''activeldap'' gem ''ruby-ldap'' gem ''will_paginate'', ''~> 3.0.2'' gem ''dm-core'' gem ''dm-aggregates'' g...

...ed # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem ''sass-rails'' gem ''coffee-rails'' # See https://github.com/sstephenson/execjs#readme for more supported runtimes # gem ''therubyracer'', :platform => :ruby gem ''uglifier'', ''>= 1.0.3'' end gem ''jquery-rails'' Routes: root :to => "home#index" home controller: class HomeController < ApplicationController def index end end -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google...

>> Now, let's clarify what I want regarding virtio-mem: >> >> 1. kexec should not add virtio-mem memory to the initial firmware >> memmap. The driver has to be in charge as discussed. >> 2. kexec should not place kexec images onto virtio-mem memory. That >> would end badly. >> 3. kexec should still dump virtio-mem memory via kdump. > > Ok,

...org'' gem ''rails'', ''3.2.0.rc2'' gem ''pg'' # Gems used only for assets and not required # in production environments by default. group :assets do gem ''sass-rails'' gem ''coffee-rails'' gem ''uglifier'' gem ''bootstrap-sass'' end gem ''jquery-rails'' gem ''therubyracer'' gem ''bcrypt-ruby'' gem ''haml-rails'' gem ''capistrano'' # tools for testing gem "rspec-rails", :group =&gt...

On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. >>>> >>> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this patch. I modified it to check the function CI is in for that attribute. >> >> Was that in the

Hi, all, Happy new year :) Referring to http://guides.rubyonrails.org/asset_pipeline.html, it seems that ''require_tree .'' in myapp/app/assets/javascripts/ application.js will include all *.js files in the myapp/app/assets/ javascripts/. I have a few other *.js files in this directory : parts.js, makes.js and categories.js. Here''s an extract from the html file I

...ack-mount-0.8.3, rack-mount-0.6.14, rack-ssl-1.3.2, rack-test-0.6.1, rack-test-0.5.7, rails-3.0.3, railties-3.1.0, railties-3.0.3, rake-0.9.2, rdoc-3.9.4, rdoc-2.5.11, rdoc-data-2.5.3, sass-3.1.7, sass-rails-3.1.1, sprockets-2.0.0, thor-0.14.6, tilt-1.3.3, treetop-1.4.10, turn-0.8.2, tzinfo-0.3.29, uglifier-1.0.3] (Gem::LoadError) from /Users/bengibson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/specification.rb:761:in `block in activate_dependencies'' from /Users/bengibson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/specification.rb:758:in `each'...

...9;'sass-rails'', ''~> 3.2.3'' gem ''coffee-rails'', ''~> 3.2.1'' # See https://github.com/sstephenson/execjs#readme for more supported runtimes # gem ''therubyracer'', :platforms => :ruby gem ''uglifier'', ''>= 1.0.3'' end gem ''jquery-rails'' # To use ActiveModel has_secure_password # gem ''bcrypt-ruby'', ''~> 3.0.0'' # To use Jbuilder templates for JSON # gem ''jbuilder'' # Use unicorn as the app...

On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. >>>>> >>>> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this

...t they can help find our > > more subtle bugs. Any idea what we should do here? > > I don't really have a good idea, but I also don't want to significantly > uglify the sourcebase... Passing two iterators is in the spirit of the standard library, so I don't consider that uglification. I understand others may disagree. In any event, leaving this kind of code in is asking for trouble down the road. -Dave