search for: ufs_debug

...ress is interleaved by 8. + * This code works for either 32/64 sized addresses. + */ + if (nblocks) { + uint32_t skip = blk ? FRAGMENTS_PER_BLK : 0; + uint32_t next = blk + skip; + size_t cnt = 1; + + /* Get address of starting blk pointer */ + map += (index << addr_shift); + + //ufs_debug("[scan] start blk: %u\n", blk); + //ufs_debug("[scan] count (nr of blks): %u\n", count); + /* Go up to the end of blk map */ + while (--count) { + map += 1 << addr_shift; + addr = get_blkaddr(map, 0, addr_shift); +#if 0 + /* Extra debugging info (Too much print...

...ress is interleaved by 8. + * This code works for either 32/64 sized addresses. + */ + if (nblocks) { + uint32_t skip = blk ? FRAGMENTS_PER_BLK : 0; + uint32_t next = blk + skip; + size_t cnt = 1; + + /* Get address of starting blk pointer */ + map += (index << addr_shift); + + //ufs_debug("[scan] start blk: %u\n", blk); + //ufs_debug("[scan] count (nr of blks): %u\n", count); + /* Go up to the end of blk map */ + while (--count) { + map += 1 << addr_shift; + addr = get_blkaddr(map, 0, addr_shift); +#if 0 + /* Extra debugging info (Too much print...

On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: > +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) > +{ > + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); > + return inode->size; > +} Something missing here? -hpa

On 05/29/2014 07:36 AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >>> +{ >>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >>> + return inode->size; >>> +} >> >> Something missing here? > Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You > can see that I didn't even set it into fs_ops. At that time, I think > Matt rem...

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to push the doc to the wiki as soon as the UFS support gets merged. Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 on Syslinux - (usage/install) ----- There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to contact the author who replied: "The name has always been

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Change since v1: * Fix bug on dentry structure (thank you specification; btw, sarcasm), and consequently a bug on ufs_readdir. * Add readlink support (applied tests for symlinks whose destionation path were stored in blk pointers and the file itself). * Several improvements. Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to

...lho wrote: >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>>>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >>>>> + return inode->size; >>>>> +} >>>> >>>> Something missing here? >>> Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You >>> can see that I didn't even set it...

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >> +{ >> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >> + return inode->size; >> +} > > Something missing here? Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You can see that I didn't even set it into fs_ops. At that time, I think Matt removed it himself as compiler com...

...AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >>>> +{ >>>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >>>> + return inode->size; >>>> +} >>> >>> Something missing here? >> Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You >> can see that I didn't even set it into fs_ops. At that tim...

...AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >>>> +{ >>>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >>>> + return inode->size; >>>> +} >>> >>> Something missing here? >> Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You >> can see that I didn't even set it into fs_ops. At that tim...

...gt;> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>>>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>>>>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n"); >>>>>> + return inode->size; >>>>>> +} >>>>> >>>>> Something missing here? >>>> Yes, implementation. It's just a placeholder until I implement it. You >>>> can see that I...