search for: ufdbguard

...port forwarding at the gateway (172.16.1.1) and websites are visible through virtual hosting through a web re-director. 3. Presently the proxy server runs in a transparent mode, i.e., all web requests goes to the gateway at port 80, they gets redirected to 3128, content filtering is done there via ufdbguard and acceptable requests are forwarded. Now we wish to switch to non-transparent mode as follows: 1. Users of our LAN are authenticated on an LDAP server and they are suppose to manually setup proxy settings for their browsers for internet access at port 3128 looking at our gateway (172.16.1.1). No...

...ufficient to provide all neded services. Also there isn't any type of shared storage (only replicated storage when two nodes with a replication schedule happen to be on at the same time). This strange setup has been serving a family of 5 for the past 10 years, providing DNS, NFS, SMB, Squid+UfdbGuard, NAT, IDS, filtering, etc.. Most of the family laptops now run W10 (Microsoft Office at school is still a hard requirement in some places) while most other boxes use Fedora with the infra servers running RHEL7. Wanting to provide centralized password management to the teenagers and not feeling...

...fficient to provide all neded services. Also there isn't any type of shared storage (only replicated storage when two nodes with a replication schedule happen to be on at the same time). This strange setup has been serving a family of 5 for the past 10 years, providing DNS, NFS, SMB, Squid+UfdbGuard, NAT, IDS, filtering, etc.. Most of the family laptops now run W10 (Microsoft Office at school is still a hard requirement in some places) while most other boxes use Fedora with the infra servers running RHEL7. Wanting to provide centralized password management to the teenagers and not feeling...