search for: uefi_network_driv

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "uefi_network_driv".

Did you mean: uefi_network_driver
2015 Jul 09
3
EFI: PXE: "My IP is 0.0.0.0"
...ain a Net?? >>> It does contain a Net but there are 2 issues with SNP: 1) The interface is different than UDPv4/TCPv4 protocols; this imply lot of code. 2) SNP has its non-blocking transmit issues ; see "Flaws in the design" at https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/UEFI_Network_Driver >>> I found out that my EFI shell on VMware VMs can also handle output redirection like: guid > fs0:\efi-guid.txt dh > fs0:\efi-dh.txt dh bd >> fs0:\efi-dh.txt fs0 being the EFI boot partition on the hard drive of the VM. <<< Yes, but I use empty virtual cl...
2015 Jul 10
0
EFI: PXE: "My IP is 0.0.0.0"
...this imply lot of code. Not as much as you may think. We already have lwIP implemented into lpxelinux.0. It's more a matter of using more glue. > 2) SNP has its non-blocking transmit issues ; see "Flaws in the design" at > https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/UEFI_Network_Driver https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/UEFI_Network_Driver#Flaws_in_the_design certainly gives some things to think about. As a side note, I'd expect anything that used SNP should be able to shut everything else off and have to implement enough of a TCP/IP stack to be proper fo...
2015 Jul 10
3
EFI: PXE: "My IP is 0.0.0.0"
...imply lot of code. Not as much as you may think.? We already have lwIP implemented into lpxelinux.0.? It's more a matter of using more glue. > 2) SNP has its non-blocking transmit issues ; see "Flaws in the design" at > https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/UEFI_Network_Driver#Flaws_in_the_design certainly gives some things to think about. As a side note, I'd expect anything that used SNP should be able to shut everything else off and have to implement enough of a TCP/IP stack to be proper for its uses (ie no need to implement TCP or respond to TCP if it doe...
2015 Jul 06
2
EFI: PXE: "My IP is 0.0.0.0"
>>> I'm just debating what's the best algorithm here.? It would seem if the LoadeImage's DeviceHandle provides UDPv4Sb, use it as it's guaranteed to be the same interface.? Otherwise, we need a MNPSb (EFI_MANAGED_NETWORK_SERVICE_BINDING) that provides UDPv4Sb across the same interface.? Presumably it should also provide TCPv4Sb (rather than being on a separate